Výsledků nalezeno: 1637
Bankrupt super league with fucking Arsenal and Juve
Kek
League where Juve cant be eliminated by mighty Ajax and Porto xaxaxaxaxaxa
Rip Football

For now all i whatch is UFC and Formula 1

Football is mafia sport this days
Načítání...
Načítání...
Lemme in
Načítání...
Načítání...
This is the only reason I don't like much world games. It's so annoying to play against someone who's spamming 200 bombers vs you, and worst if it's blitz because it doesn't change much either, china india alliance and china spamming bombers is just......................
Načítání...
Načítání...
As a moderator I feel it's in the best interest for the Atwar community that I lock this thread to prevent any further toxicity.

THIS THREAD HAS BEEN LOCKED BY ~DOMINOZ
Načítání...
Načítání...
Mirage all together
">
Načítání...
Načítání...
Napsáno Skanderbeg, 20.04.2021 at 10:53

Napsáno ITSGG1122, 15.04.2021 at 05:09

Stalin killed more men than hitler.


Im just here to count before gigi gets muted again


what are you now again? buryati? serb? russian? greek? lier? stop trolling and stop quoting me.
Načítání...
Načítání...
Raul & Niels do your darn game before I break out the whip.
Načítání...
Načítání...
Amok x Ivan
Načítání...
Načítání...
Napsáno Witch-Doctor, 15.04.2021 at 12:41

He was probably using a strategy called Sky Menance which gives bombers extra attack. My tip to dealing with this is to wall yourself and expand as best as you can. You're turkey, so you should have a massive numerical advantage over France. You should be able to overwhelm him with all your reinforcements. Try to predict where he will send bombers and defend that country.


Agreed.
Načítání...
Načítání...
Načítání...
Načítání...
Napsáno PleaseMe, 20.04.2021 at 13:30

Mexico and USA so happy for the next world cup

USA AHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAH, USA team would lose to any U16 team ahahahha
Načítání...
Načítání...
Mexico and USA so happy for the next world cup
Načítání...
Načítání...
In! <3
Načítání...
Načítání...
Sid
20.04.2021 v [DENIED] Last Appeal
Didn't follow the format, nothing more than that needs to be said, but Croat did give you a nice explanation.
Načítání...
Načítání...
Napsáno stalin5678, 20.04.2021 at 12:51

Yes the us did freak out when the soviets placed nukes in cuba and the reason why they casually put nukes in turkey was because they were selfish and never cared about what the ussr wanted. It was all a game of cat and mouse. Each one trying to outsmart the other. Here both us and ussr are cats and mouses in their own fields. The threat of soviet russia was real as they wanted the entire world under their rule. They wanted to unite their people using other nations as demons. And for the matter of pakistan and india, it is not balanced. India has made a retaliatory strike policy for their nukes which means they will only strike back in retaliation. Meanwhile pakistan is different, their country has been through military dictatorships alot so they made a first strike policy, which means they will launch their nukes at any case of war. Secondly Pakistan has also been waging guerrilla warfare inside india by aiding islamic fundamentalists and kashmiris to strike india. We cannot let the russian gain an inch of ground nor advantage over others as it will make them feel more emboldened to strike other targets that are in their interest. Eg baltic nations. Then about the us invading other countries and capturing people. The invasion of iraq was a direct propaganda move by the conservatives in usa. Which means not all of the people supported it as they used the excuse of 9/11 and the proapect of iraq building nukes. The same goes for libya. They have invaded alot of nations as they wanted theri type of democracy in those lands. Which i do not clearly support nor clearly detest. But being a superpower they have to help their allies and their interests to secure more friendships and prove that they will defend you. The reason why romania had allowed nukes to be set up there was due to their fear of russia. They wanted an alliance with usa and they got one. So it is the us's policy to defend their allies.
I would never allow russia to gt what they want in ukraine as it will remind us of adolf hitler and his 'promises'. The appeasement is the most greatest example of what russia is trying to do with the us and the rest of the world


1) I acknowledge your comment about Pakistan-India. I support India in that conflict because from my view, i see Pakistan provoking India, i need more information to see from pakistani side proving India provokes them. I also see Kashmir as Indian territory, but i don't have complete picture about that place. Although, i assume that after independence, the territory belongs to India as it was before colonization.

2) In US-Russia conflict, you are choosing sides. You are choosing one empire over another. I am trying to not choose a side, but if others choose, then i must choose as well so i don't lag behind which eventually can backfire if enemy empire win.

What gives USA more right in Iraq than Russia in Ukraine? Or USA in Libya than Russia in Baltic? How can one empire's meddling be wanted and the other detested, unless you are choosing side?

3) Using Hitler as example doesn't suit well in an argument and debate (godwin law), you can't compare something so evil with a modern country, because not only you paint that country black, but you also water down real crimes against humanity perpetrated by hitler.
Načítání...
Načítání...
Napsáno Helixforce30, 20.04.2021 at 12:54

How do i join

You must be at least rank 6 to join.
Načítání...
Načítání...
How do i join
Načítání...
Načítání...
Napsáno Skanderbeg, 20.04.2021 at 10:36

Napsáno stalin5678, 15.04.2021 at 05:36

the only true moments of peace we ever had was from 1815-1830, 1914-1930 and 1991-1998. if u observe all the peace times comes just after a war. and every war costs more than a million lives. we have more than a dozen nuclear armed countries which could signal the destruction of millions or billions. if we go for war. then what einstein said will be correct " i don't know what weapons will be used in ww3, but i do know that ww4 will be fought using sticks and stones"


Napsáno stalin5678, 15.04.2021 at 05:45

And then talking about the anxiousness about a country' motives. china and japan were a threat to each other since the beginning of time. from the ghosts of tsushima to the yi sun-sin and to the ww2 period. they have lived to coexist with the dangers next to them. another example is india and pakistan. we have fought against each other since the beginning of our independence. there are frequent air skirmishes, border attacks and insurgent threats. but we have been able to coexist and deescalate the threat every time. but now the stakes are even higher since both of them have nukes. russia can survive the threats faced by a ukrainian nato. But if we let the russians win. then the next target will be warsaw, then berlin, paris, london and so on. they will never stop their ambitions as long as a soviet loyalist ike putin is on the presidency. we have to keep bold actions. for each country that falls to nationalism or anarchy. our countries will be a step closer towards it, regardless of the cultures, economy and history.


There must be balance of power (great powers), you used good example of Pakistan vs India, they have nukes and now its balanced, but USA-Russia front is not balanced due to US freaking out when USSR tried to place nukes on Cuba, while USA casually placed nukes in Turkey back then, and today casually in Poland, Czechia and Romania.

For example Romania, like France in NATO, was outside command chain in Warsaw Pact, and now when they are in NATO they have US bases and nukes, now they are legitimate target in case of WW3, why do they risk that?

You say Ukraine in NATO is not a problem, but if you let Russia win (but you dont say win where? ww3 or ukraine?) then next target is warsaw, berlin, london. But what about USA? They agreed to end Cold War in 1989 with USSR and when USSR collapsed 2 years later, they became the largest empire on earth; invading nations across the globe, literally everywhere, kidnapping people in americas, africa, europe, asia, and sending them back to black sites.

I don't how can you fear more potential Russia than real USA, it doesn't make sense. To accept current US oppression only because potential future Russia can invade London sounds very pessimistic and defeatist to me.

Yes the us did freak out when the soviets placed nukes in cuba and the reason why they casually put nukes in turkey was because they were selfish and never cared about what the ussr wanted. It was all a game of cat and mouse. Each one trying to outsmart the other. Here both us and ussr are cats and mouses in their own fields. The threat of soviet russia was real as they wanted the entire world under their rule. They wanted to unite their people using other nations as demons. And for the matter of pakistan and india, it is not balanced. India has made a retaliatory strike policy for their nukes which means they will only strike back in retaliation. Meanwhile pakistan is different, their country has been through military dictatorships alot so they made a first strike policy, which means they will launch their nukes at any case of war. Secondly Pakistan has also been waging guerrilla warfare inside india by aiding islamic fundamentalists and kashmiris to strike india. We cannot let the russian gain an inch of ground nor advantage over others as it will make them feel more emboldened to strike other targets that are in their interest. Eg baltic nations. Then about the us invading other countries and capturing people. The invasion of iraq was a direct propaganda move by the conservatives in usa. Which means not all of the people supported it as they used the excuse of 9/11 and the proapect of iraq building nukes. The same goes for libya. They have invaded alot of nations as they wanted theri type of democracy in those lands. Which i do not clearly support nor clearly detest. But being a superpower they have to help their allies and their interests to secure more friendships and prove that they will defend you. The reason why romania had allowed nukes to be set up there was due to their fear of russia. They wanted an alliance with usa and they got one. So it is the us's policy to defend their allies.
I would never allow russia to gt what they want in ukraine as it will remind us of adolf hitler and his 'promises'. The appeasement is the most greatest example of what russia is trying to do with the us and the rest of the world
Načítání...
Načítání...
20.04.2021 v Paradox is back.
Napsáno Croat, 20.04.2021 at 03:58

Napsáno cascaval, 19.04.2021 at 21:07

Isn't this the dude that started like 30 coalitions?


Who are you and what is wrong with your head?

ASDFASDFA
Načítání...
Načítání...
Citovat:
You say Ukraine in NATO is not a problem, but if you let Russia win (but you dont say win where? ww3 or ukraine?)

I meant if we let russia get what they want . Then they will win in ukraine
Načítání...
Načítání...
20.04.2021 v Paradox is back.
Napsáno Croat, 20.04.2021 at 03:58

Napsáno cascaval, 19.04.2021 at 21:07

Isn't this the dude that started like 30 coalitions?


Who are you and what is wrong with your head?


Must've been some other Croat
Načítání...
Načítání...
Germany opted for cuckiness and didnt join.
Načítání...
Načítání...
Napsáno ITSGG1122, 15.04.2021 at 05:09

Stalin killed more men than hitler.


Im just here to count before gigi gets muted again
Načítání...
Načítání...
Atwarburg v.2
Načítání...
Načítání...
Napsáno Nero, 31.03.2021 at 13:03

He didn't get enough attention on that one so he had to make another


I enjoy coming back to talk to afterwind friends and read forum, if it triggers you, that's just bonus
Načítání...
Načítání...
Napsáno stalin5678, 15.04.2021 at 05:36

the only true moments of peace we ever had was from 1815-1830, 1914-1930 and 1991-1998. if u observe all the peace times comes just after a war. and every war costs more than a million lives. we have more than a dozen nuclear armed countries which could signal the destruction of millions or billions. if we go for war. then what einstein said will be correct " i don't know what weapons will be used in ww3, but i do know that ww4 will be fought using sticks and stones"


Napsáno stalin5678, 15.04.2021 at 05:45

And then talking about the anxiousness about a country' motives. china and japan were a threat to each other since the beginning of time. from the ghosts of tsushima to the yi sun-sin and to the ww2 period. they have lived to coexist with the dangers next to them. another example is india and pakistan. we have fought against each other since the beginning of our independence. there are frequent air skirmishes, border attacks and insurgent threats. but we have been able to coexist and deescalate the threat every time. but now the stakes are even higher since both of them have nukes. russia can survive the threats faced by a ukrainian nato. But if we let the russians win. then the next target will be warsaw, then berlin, paris, london and so on. they will never stop their ambitions as long as a soviet loyalist ike putin is on the presidency. we have to keep bold actions. for each country that falls to nationalism or anarchy. our countries will be a step closer towards it, regardless of the cultures, economy and history.


There must be balance of power (great powers), you used good example of Pakistan vs India, they have nukes and now its balanced, but USA-Russia front is not balanced due to US freaking out when USSR tried to place nukes on Cuba, while USA casually placed nukes in Turkey back then, and today casually in Poland, Czechia and Romania.

For example Romania, like France in NATO, was outside command chain in Warsaw Pact, and now when they are in NATO they have US bases and nukes, now they are legitimate target in case of WW3, why do they risk that?

You say Ukraine in NATO is not a problem, but if you let Russia win (but you dont say win where? ww3 or ukraine?) then next target is warsaw, berlin, london. But what about USA? They agreed to end Cold War in 1989 with USSR and when USSR collapsed 2 years later, they became the largest empire on earth; invading nations across the globe, literally everywhere, kidnapping people in americas, africa, europe, asia, and sending them back to black sites.

I don't how can you fear more potential Russia than real USA, it doesn't make sense. To accept current US oppression only because potential future Russia can invade London sounds very pessimistic and defeatist to me.
Načítání...
Načítání...
Napsáno Leo, 19.04.2021 at 19:09

Bad idea. Big European games will lose their prestige, domestic leagues will get disbanded, and small teams will suffer. It's just a positive feedback loop for the top teams at this point. If football was always like this since day1 none will complain. But we have 70 years of history behind us we can't simply rewrite. Football needs something fresh but not this.

But from perspective of Barça supporter, maybe we need this or we go bankrupt D


"We go bankrupt", no my friend the owners get bankrupt. The super league officials themselves have stated they their FIRST priority is profit and that football along with the fans are their SECOND priority, if the super league happens I will stop supporting the club whom I have followed for a decade now.
Načítání...
Načítání...
20.04.2021 v Wall abuse
Napsáno Kaska, 20.04.2021 at 09:52

Napsáno Witch-Doctor, 20.04.2021 at 09:31

Napsáno Kaska, 20.04.2021 at 09:25

Atwar (what it claims to be) : the art of strategy

Atwar (what it actually is) : the art of improving nerds mechanisms and bug abuse.


These "nerd mechanism" is hardly difficult for anybody to learn. There's many guides on them and takes no more effort to learn them than learning a new shortcut for expansions. You might as well call doing specific shortcuts and expansions nerd mechanisms as well.


I do, shortcuts are the nerdiest thing on earth. Same goes for the latemove thing.

I just mean that being good at atwar has nothing to do with being good at strategy

You finally discovered that atwar was a nerd game good job
Načítání...
Načítání...
20.04.2021 v Wall abuse
OK. I retract my previous argument. Although not a bannable offense. Still a slimey way to play.
Načítání...
Načítání...
20.04.2021 v Wall abuse
Napsáno Witch-Doctor, 20.04.2021 at 09:31

Napsáno Kaska, 20.04.2021 at 09:25

Atwar (what it claims to be) : the art of strategy

Atwar (what it actually is) : the art of improving nerds mechanisms and bug abuse.


These "nerd mechanism" is hardly difficult for anybody to learn. There's many guides on them and takes no more effort to learn them than learning a new shortcut for expansions. You might as well call doing specific shortcuts and expansions nerd mechanisms as well.


I do, shortcuts are the nerdiest thing on earth. Same goes for the latemove thing.

I just mean that being good at atwar has nothing to do with being good at strategy
Načítání...
Načítání...
atWar

About Us
Contact

Soukromí | Smluvní podmínky | Bannery | Partners

Copyright © 2021 atWar. All rights reserved.

Připoj se k nám na

Šiřte slovo