The final RA buff

We need to buff RA a little but not buff the tanks we should buff the RA inf give them a +1 att and +1 range this way they can attack they are kind of like a secondary attack unit that are cheaper and have a -10 cost upgrade for tanks or put that into RA either way is fine. I see this as the best way to buff RA making it more usable if this isn't accepted then i don't what will.

I would motify it to give secondary attack +1 attack, remove the -1 defense from infantry and just make militia weaker, because if you think about it, the attacking of tanks and inf in a relentless war campaign should make a home militia army basically useless.

From my personal experience, RA main problem is economic and it's a worse problem because of militias and infantries cost, not tanks. So, if I had to change anything on the strategy to give it a small buff, it would certainly be reduce infs and militias cost.

I was going to make an essay. It was called: Relentless Attack: The most powerful strategy for 1vs1vs1?


then I noticed tanks with +2 def suddely where lowered to +1 def without any advise.

RA is fine as is. As an early strategy that has disadvantages and limits, it encourages new players to develop and experiment with the other strategies.

{Then once they mastered them all, they can go back to PD}

Napsáno brianwl, 09.09.2014 at 13:41

RA is fine as is. As an early strategy that has disadvantages and limits, it encourages new players to develop and experiment with the other strategies.

{Then once they mastered them all, they can go back to PD}

Yes, they need to learn the power of PD's faggotry