How did Boris even get in? Is this a joke? Who voted for that fool?

Wtf? How is my little island meant to stay a float?

#MAGA
(Make Anglo-saxons Great Again!)

Your leaders lacks elegance, sophistication and culture in general, but sadly I think it's what is needed nowadays for western preservation.

Unlike us continental Europeans whom are enslaved by appearances and political correctness

Napsáno Kaska, 23.07.2019 at 08:41

Your leaders lacks elegance, sophistication and culture in general, but sadly I think it's what is needed nowadays for western preservation.

Unlike us continental Europeans whom are enslaved but appearances and political correctness

When will you guys behead macron?

I've followed Boris for a long time, he's an intellectual and to deny that is to deny reality. I watched his Greek v Rome debate where he organized an excellent defense of Western values and its roots in Greek culture; I could think if no one more fit for the job at this time than him. During his tenure as Mayor of London, the crime rate fell by 23% between 2007/2008 and 2015/2016. There's nothing worse than inaction. Boris will take action on brexit and finally deliver a result, with or without a deal.

Napsáno 4nic, 23.07.2019 at 10:38

Napsáno Kaska, 23.07.2019 at 08:41

Your leaders lacks elegance, sophistication and culture in general, but sadly I think it's what is needed nowadays for western preservation.

Unlike us continental Europeans whom are enslaved but appearances and political correctness

When will you guys behead macron?

The sooner the better bro, that guy is a real piece of trash, which saddens me is many dumb people actually buy his shit

Napsáno DeepFriedUnicorn, 23.07.2019 at 06:10

Wtf? How is my little island meant to stay a float?

He wasn't elected properly just by the toxic tory party members 80% of whom are racist ERG thugs

Napsáno Tribune Aquila, 23.07.2019 at 14:29

I've followed Boris for a long time, he's an intellectual and to deny that is to deny reality. I watched his Greek v Rome debate where he organized an excellent defense of Western values and its roots in Greek culture; I could think if no one more fit for the job at this time than him. During his tenure as Mayor of London, the crime rate fell by 23% between 2007/2008 and 2015/2016. There's nothing worse than inaction. Boris will take action on brexit and finally deliver a result, with or without a deal.

He has huge potential to put my country in an awkward position and put a poxy border up. If he does that, it will fuck up the union even more. The UK is falling apart and now with him in? And with the public not even having an option to vote?

He may possibly be good when it comes to historical debate and and talks(I've seen that vid too) But, if he puts that border up, it will, most likely, start conflicts in the North. Scotland has a vote to leave again in the next 2 years. They wanted to stay in the EU and now are being forced out of it because London lied to them, even wales is talking and debating about independence.

I Don't think he can fix the union, he acts like a fool too often to be taken seriously.

Xaxaxaxaxa

Napsáno lsilorien, 24.07.2019 at 03:09

Napsáno DeepFriedUnicorn, 23.07.2019 at 06:10

Wtf? How is my little island meant to stay a float?

He wasn't elected properly just by the toxic tory party members 80% of whom are racist ERG thugs

Lol, thats the stupidest generalisation ever, its like saying only soyboys voted for hillary or rednecks for trump, if he won it means a majority wanted him, smearing his name after he won fairly is shameful.

Napsáno DeepFriedUnicorn, 24.07.2019 at 06:39

Napsáno Tribune Aquila, 23.07.2019 at 14:29

I've followed Boris for a long time, he's an intellectual and to deny that is to deny reality. I watched his Greek v Rome debate where he organized an excellent defense of Western values and its roots in Greek culture; I could think if no one more fit for the job at this time than him. During his tenure as Mayor of London, the crime rate fell by 23% between 2007/2008 and 2015/2016. There's nothing worse than inaction. Boris will take action on brexit and finally deliver a result, with or without a deal.

He has huge potential to put my country in an awkward position and put a poxy border up. If he does that, it will fuck up the union even more. The UK is falling apart and now with him in? And with the public not even having an option to vote?

He may possibly be good when it comes to historical debate and and talks(I've seen that vid too) But, if he puts that border up, it will, most likely, start conflicts in the North. Scotland has a vote to leave again in the next 2 years. They wanted to stay in the EU and now are being forced out of it because London lied to them, even wales is talking and debating about independence.

I Don't think he can fix the union, he acts like a fool too often to be taken seriously.

ironic how only 80 years ago britain was the biggest country in the world, now its devolving into a 3rd grade european country, scotland wales independent 2 small countries who wont matter on the world stage, north ireland would either cede to scotland or ireland, and england alone will probably be on par with spain italy poland turkey

I guess its karma for all the war crimes British empire did in its imperialism.

Napsáno DeepFriedUnicorn, 24.07.2019 at 06:39

He has huge potential to put my country in an awkward position and put a poxy border up. If he does that, it will fuck up the union even more.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems to me like the one putting Ireland in an awkward position is not Boris or the UK at all. It's the EU. The UK doesn't want border checks brought back - the EU does. The EU wants to prevent British goods getting in, not the other way around. The whole backstop was the EU's idea... not Britain's. The UK rejected it.

It seems like a clever ploy by the EU to punish the UK for wanting to leave. If the EU imposes border checks, any trouble arising will be targeted at Britain, not Brussels. Or, if to prevent this the UK acquiesces and allows NI to stay under EU rules, then NI will eventually leave the UK altogether... Net gain to the EU.

Either way the EU gets what they want. Which is sad because they could easily have allowed a clean break if they wanted to... But they won't. They could forget the backstop and simply do nothing... If a few British goods get into the EU via Ireland, who cares?

Napsáno Dave, 24.07.2019 at 09:49

Napsáno DeepFriedUnicorn, 24.07.2019 at 06:39

He has huge potential to put my country in an awkward position and put a poxy border up. If he does that, it will fuck up the union even more.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems to me like the one putting Ireland in an awkward position is not Boris or the UK at all. It's the EU. The UK doesn't want border checks brought back - the EU does. The EU wants to prevent British goods getting in, not the other way around. The whole backstop was the EU's idea... not Britain's. The UK rejected it.

It seems like a clever ploy by the EU to punish the UK for wanting to leave. If the EU imposes border checks, any trouble arising will be targeted at Britain, not Brussels. Or, if to prevent this the UK acquiesces and allows NI to stay under EU rules, then NI will eventually leave the UK altogether... Net gain to the EU.

Either way the EU gets what they want. Which is sad because they could easily have allowed a clean break if they wanted to... But they won't. They could forget the backstop and simply do nothing... If a few British goods get into the EU via Ireland, who cares?

I'll correct you, not a bother

Agreed, to an extent...I agree with the European Union. But only as an economic union, That's why my anger goes more to my government and other governments in the EU.

Reason being, governments that are part of the EU are all "Yes men" and have no idea how to say a simple "No" to the EU, especially my weak ass pussy brain fucking dead "Government".

My gov are extremely weak and lazy, so much sloppy law making and getting raped in the ass over the years, that they are always going to be stuck in every department, no matter what it is, this has been happening since the 60s, our economy was really good after the war and in the 50s because our country "Opened up" more to and started making suff and Communicating with the world.
Dublin gets the most treatment but the rest get the leftovers and don't get the attention they need. Our silly weak and insanely lazy of a government is still debating where exactly to put our "Great and so much needed and expensive" metro links that the rest of our public transport, roads and paths are not getting attention. Our last health minister was our current PM and crap and useless and the one before that was Obese and our current one, unfortunately, has everyone over here saying, he has "Blood on his hands" many cancer patients have died since he has took over as our health department is to blame and he's stuck with all the pressure.
Even all these statistics that the world sees about Ireland being "Rich" or "GDP rising" bamboozles us... Where? Where is our "Rich" wealth going? Into their pockets or our debt we pay off? Maybe they are actually all corrupt as a lot of people over here say.

We all don't know, because we all can't see our "GDP rising" Our government is insanely lazy when making laws that even all drugs where legal to take for one day until they fixed it the next day, waaaaayy more lazy law making in other areas and uniquely dumb implemented loop holes too. I was even at a green party meeting once, they were even talking about the metro(That we don't need) and where to put it and brought up that they should not expand on Dublin Airport because "It's bad for the environment" they all agreed, I didn't, I said it's good for our economy taking the fact that tourism is our biggest and most important income contributer and the future for our economy doesn't look so bright so a big investment like that makes sense to the nation...
They looked at me like I had two heads, I get it, fuel is not your style. But tourism is essential for our economy growth, especially now with Brexit and the near future looking more and more dangerous for our economy.
They still looked at me like I had two heads...

Oh yeah and our newst children's hospital is currently being conducted RIGHT Next to a hospital that is falling apart, needs expanding and attention and has bearley any parking and is deep inside a residential zone that also has bearley any parking and is insanely high density. It was costing the government about €600 mill to build...Guess what it is estimated to be now, because our financial department "Made a mistake"? Over €1.6 Billion... My government is unfortunately incompetent.

Back to the EU,

It's literally so easy to say to the EU, "No" or "We'll do it ourselves, we would appreciate if you would not get involved"

But unfortunately they are afraid of saying it, because they think the EU will what? Attack them? Put Sanctions on them? Boot them out? Arrest them?

The EU can't do ANYTHING and will not do ANYTHING, because it's just an economic union that Thinks it's some sort of "United" power house or something

It's the individual governments that are to blame for this overconfident and even cocky European Union that thinks it is a soild nation. Its a joke. And the pussboy governments fault for not saying,
"Nah mate, this is just an economic union. What do you think you're doing? We'll handle this ourselves, thanks."

I do support the EU, but only as an economic union and on the side also purposes that our continent should take pride in our achievements and understand that, what we have done is remarkable, in regards to history, geopolitics, art, environmental and even that our presence has the world what it is today and understanding that bickering and "Orders" from the EU is not necessarily, a good thing.

I understand that the EU has regulations and requirements, and also needs to get loans back. But. They must stop acting like a country and act as a union. Its not the EUs fault, it's each individual governments for allowing them to think that they are some
"United States" of America, but in Europe.
They are not powerful and need to stop thinking that Europe will ever unite. It has too much tensions to unite as "country" under one flag.

Anyway. Back to the Boris

I disagree that he'll be beneficial to the union, maybe to England, but all the others? No, too much tension. Scotland got screwed with Brexit, they didn't want to leave and are getting another vote soon. Wales isn't happy whatsoever, so much so, that even Joke and Meme pages on twitter and Facebook are sparking the debate of leaving the UK and going their own way, they didn't vote for Boris and now he's leading them? Northern Ireland is just their stuck, twiddling their thumbs wondering, "Lads, what do we do now?" it's just insane.

It's possible that Boris would do great for England, but not for the UK, this is the second leader no on voted for, in my opinion, people across the UK are not happy.

Napsáno DeepFriedUnicorn, 24.07.2019 at 11:17

I'll correct you, not a bother

Agreed, to an extent...I agree with the European Union. But only as an economic union, That's why my anger goes more to my government and other governments in the EU.

Reason being, governments that are part of the EU are all "Yes men" and have no idea how to say a simple "No" to the EU, especially my weak ass pussy brain fucking dead "Government".

My gov are extremely weak and lazy, so much sloppy law making and getting raped in the ass over the years, that they are always going to be stuck in every department, no matter what it is, this has been happening since the 60s, our economy was really good after the war and in the 50s because our country "Opened up" more to and started making suff and Communicating with the world.
Dublin gets the most treatment but the rest get the leftovers and don't get the attention they need. Our silly weak and insanely lazy of a government is still debating where exactly to put our "Great and so much needed and expensive" metro links that the rest of our public transport, roads and paths are not getting attention. Our last health minister was our current PM and crap and useless and the one before that was Obese and our current one, unfortunately, has everyone over here saying, he has "Blood on his hands" many cancer patients have died since he has took over as our health department is to blame and he's stuck with all the pressure.
Even all these statistics that the world sees about Ireland being "Rich" or "GDP rising" bamboozles us... Where? Where is our "Rich" wealth going? Into their pockets or our debt we pay off? Maybe they are actually all corrupt as a lot of people over here say.

We all don't know, because we all can't see our "GDP rising" Our government is insanely lazy when making laws that even all drugs where legal to take for one day until they fixed it the next day, waaaaayy more lazy law making in other areas and uniquely dumb implemented loop holes too. I was even at a green party meeting once, they were even talking about the metro(That we don't need) and where to put it and brought up that they should not expand on Dublin Airport because "It's bad for the environment" they all agreed, I didn't, I said it's good for our economy taking the fact that tourism is our biggest and most important income contributer and the future for our economy doesn't look so bright so a big investment like that makes sense to the nation...
They looked at me like I had two heads, I get it, fuel is not your style. But tourism is essential for our economy growth, especially now with Brexit and the near future looking more and more dangerous for our economy.
They still looked at me like I had two heads...

Oh yeah and our newst children's hospital is currently being conducted RIGHT Next to a hospital that is falling apart, needs expanding and attention and has bearley any parking and is deep inside a residential zone that also has bearley any parking and is insanely high density. It was costing the government about €600 mill to build...Guess what it is estimated to be now, because our financial department "Made a mistake"? Over €1.6 Billion... My government is unfortunately incompetent.

Back to the EU,

It's literally so easy to say to the EU, "No" or "We'll do it ourselves, we would appreciate if you would not get involved"

But unfortunately they are afraid of saying it, because they think the EU will what? Attack them? Put Sanctions on them? Boot them out? Arrest them?

The EU can't do ANYTHING and will not do ANYTHING, because it's just an economic union that Thinks it's some sort of "United" power house or something

It's the individual governments that are to blame for this overconfident and even cocky European Union that thinks it is a soild nation. Its a joke. And the pussboy governments fault for not saying,
"Nah mate, this is just an economic union. What do you think you're doing? We'll handle this ourselves, thanks."

I do support the EU, but only as an economic union and on the side also purposes that our continent should take pride in our achievements and understand that, what we have done is remarkable, in regards to history, geopolitics, art, environmental and even that our presence has the world what it is today and understanding that bickering and "Orders" from the EU is not necessarily, a good thing.

I understand that the EU has regulations and requirements, and also needs to get loans back. But. They must stop acting like a country and act as a union. Its not the EUs fault, it's each individual governments for allowing them to think that they are some
"United States" of America, but in Europe.
They are not powerful and need to stop thinking that Europe will ever unite. It has too much tensions to unite as "country" under one flag.

Anyway. Back to the Boris

I disagree that he'll be beneficial to the union, maybe to England, but all the others? No, too much tension. Scotland got screwed with Brexit, they didn't want to leave and are getting another vote soon. Wales isn't happy whatsoever, so much so, that even Joke and Meme pages on twitter and Facebook are sparking the debate of leaving the UK and going their own way, they didn't vote for Boris and now he's leading them? Northern Ireland is just their stuck, twiddling their thumbs wondering, "Lads, what do we do now?" it's just insane.

It's possible that Boris would do great for England, but not for the UK, this is the second leader no on voted for, in my opinion, people across the UK are not happy.

nerd

Napsáno BLACKMETAL3199, 24.07.2019 at 12:54

I enjoy politics and economics

Napsáno DeepFriedUnicorn, 24.07.2019 at 11:17

Napsáno Dave, 24.07.2019 at 09:49

Correct me if I'm wrong

I'll correct you, not a bother

I stand corrected.

I appreciate hearing your perspective. Since I'm just an outside observer my information comes primarily from what I read in the news (taken with a grain of salt). So it's interesting to hear the frank opinion of someone directly effected by it all.

I had no idea the Irish government was so inept. Sounds a bit like the government here in California. We must have had the same people building our $70B train to nowhere.

So in that situation, if that's the government you've got to work with...

Napsáno 4nic, 24.07.2019 at 08:17

Napsáno lsilorien, 24.07.2019 at 03:09

Napsáno DeepFriedUnicorn, 23.07.2019 at 06:10

Wtf? How is my little island meant to stay a float?

He wasn't elected properly just by the toxic tory party members 80% of whom are racist ERG thugs

Lol, thats the stupidest generalisation ever, its like saying only soyboys voted for hillary or rednecks for trump, if he won it means a majority wanted him, smearing his name after he won fairly is shameful.

you know nothing how leadership elections work. Only 100,000 tory members out of 70 million population. A majority may have wanted him but not the right one at the ballot.

Napsáno Dave, 24.07.2019 at 13:37

Napsáno DeepFriedUnicorn, 24.07.2019 at 11:17

Napsáno Dave, 24.07.2019 at 09:49

Correct me if I'm wrong

I'll correct you, not a bother

I stand corrected.

I appreciate hearing your perspective. Since I'm just an outside observer my information comes primarily from what I read in the news (taken with a grain of salt). So it's interesting to hear the frank opinion of someone directly effected by it all.

I had no idea the Irish government was so inept. Sounds a bit like the government here in California. We must have had the same people building our $70B train to nowhere.

So in that situation, if that's the government you've got to work with...

70bil? How?

You don't have to read:

My personal opinion on why this happened is because after the 40s all the people who fought for independence and understood military and administration were dying off, and ever since then the country has been on a constant cycle of "Picking up the pieces" from the last governments "Mistakes" then we got caught up in the troubles and were scared to not tick off Thatcher, taken the fact that she actually retaliated to Argentinian aggression.

Then we got the shite sorted in the North, then a short little "Growth" in our economy which I disagree that it was actually because of "our" economy and is actually in regards to the world's wealth in general, I.e less wars, USSR fell, so obviously more profit, because a lot of new capitalist countries popped up, China perfected what the Late Soviets were trying to do (Capitalist economy but a Communist/dictatorship government), victory in the 90s for the west against Iraq, technology, transportation and communication rapidly advanced because of WW2 and the cold War leading into the 90s, tourism grew rapidly too in the 90s - 00s and many more things.

Then the world had a financial crash, hit us too. Imo this happened because the 90s and 00s was the first ever time humanity was living in a paradise and the populations of countries and companies had so much freedom and new potentials unlike any other citizens than the ones before them, that they spent too much and screwed themselves over. This literally happened to us, people gave out too much money then when they needed it, the others said "Well...We spent it." and obviously this happened to alot of other countries too.

Leading the Irish government, yet again, "Picking up the pieces" from the last government and the most recent world events.
Our political parties are still clumsy and weak and imo, still will be in the near future with the same slogan news reporters love saying every general election in our country... "Picking up the pieces from the last government?"

Now today, again, more interesting and unique geopolitical events are happening that no government really knows what's going to happen. Private space companies, space colonialism and conflicts (On earth) will happen because of space, social media forceimg a unique and yet disturbing change in our society and more and more political parties are popping up.

Boris Johnson will be one of the worst Prime Minister's in our nations history. As it stands, the Tories are declaring an all out war on the public and will govern us with the staunchest Thatcherite figures among the Tory Party. There is nothing 'conservative', 'traditional' or 'nationalist' about Johnson or his ilk. They are enemies of the people, enemies of the 'West' and explicit enemies of both the worker and the native Anglo-Celt. I will explain why and it's not because they are Brexiteers as some suggest in this thread.

The first action Johnson took as Prime Minister was to rip up Theresa May's immigration plans which included the 2010 pledge to reduce net immigration to 50k a year. While May and the Tories have never been serious about their pledge, May did foster some brazen and public anti-immigration rhetoric while never properly enforcing it. Her 'Hostile Environment' policies were slated by leftists, but they only affected a few hundred immigrants per policy and at most increased the costs of attaining citizenship. It did little to affect immigration and was just a publicity stunt to keep the Tory base on their side. By tearing this pledge apart, Johnson is taking off the mask and showing the true face of mass immigration as a capitalist venture. Johnson plans to adopt the infamous 'Australian Points System' which the likes of Farage and other lolbergs flaunt like it's the holy grail. A simple comparison of some statistics shows the problem with this 'wonderful' policy:

Citovat:

2018: Australia net migration = 237k, pop. 24.6m
2018: UK net migration = 258k, pop. 66m

The Australian points system is unlimited. If adopted in its entirety without limitations - which is likely as Johnson refuses to answer whether he would set limits - UK net immigration could triple to 750k a year. In comparison, Corbyn is likely to the social right of Johnson in this policy. Even Corbyn isn't this insane to import almost a million people a year.

Johnson also wants to give an amnesty to the million+ illegals currently living in the UK. This is not the actions of a so-called Conservative. In some eyes, it could be called 'progressive' but it's intentions are Thatcherite in nature and are malicious towards the native working class bloc. It also shows that 'Capitalism' and 'Progressivism' go hand in hand. Socialism and the Social Right are far more complimentary to one another.

Johnson and his cabinet follow a strategy written in the treatise 'Britannia Unchained' and will likely add the Trumpian dialect coupled with Johnson's bombastic mannerisms. It's a filthy, dirty, ultra-capital elite plan of action.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Britannia_Unchained

Citovat:

"The text sets out their vision for the United Kingdom's future as a leading player in the global economy, arguing that Britain needs to adopt a far-reaching form of free market economics, with fewer employment laws and suggesting the United Kingdom should learn lessons from the business and economic practices of other countries, including Canada, Australia and the tiger economies of the Far East like China and Singapore.[1][2] All five of the co-authors became part of the cabinet of Prime Minister Boris Johnson in 2019."

Key words: 'Free Market', 'Fewer Employment Laws'.
Translation: 'Fuck Whitey and fuck working people'

The comparison to China is the most insulting part and I'll get into that later. Here's a really painful example of the glaring hole they have when it comes to policy:

Citovat:

"On education, the authors lament the relatively low number of students who study mathematics at A Level which they say is 15%, contrasting it with Japan where 85% study the subject at a similar level."

This is true but the authors never ask why. Why is maths more important in Japan but not in the UK? A century ago, Britons were top in this subject and one of the worlds largest producers. What happened? Maths is considered high status in Japan but not in Britain. Who sets the tone and agenda of who or what is high status in the UK? High status in the UK is taken by the most loudmouth obnoxious virtue signallers or useless drug-addicted celebrities. That was a product of industry, subsidised by the state. 'Liberation' politics dictates education and the upper class never fought it. They placated and wholly adopted it. They promoted it and yet they have the nerve to claim it is the fault of the working class for policies THEY set upon us. These policies were rejected by the public and took decades and multi-generational social engineering to embed within the social structure. This was top-down and the people at the top are blaming those at the bottom. Disgusting.

Citovat:

"The British are among the worst idlers in the world. We work among the lowest hours, we retire early and our productivity is poor. Whereas Indian children aspire to be doctors or businessmen, the British are more interested in football and pop music"

This is astonishing bigotry that would NEVER be written about any other non-white ethnic group. Non-white unemployment is double that of native Brits. The message in the treatise is very clear: Replace Britons with foreign workers that are more compliant, more willing to work for less and are less likely to form unions or worker collectives that demand better conditions. This is downright treasonous rhetoric. Again, the question is never asked why this lack of 'productivity' is occurring. Why did one of the hardest working people in the world with the highest work ethic suddenly become like this? The masses have little say in politics. The upper class and their financial power has the last say. They are the leaders and the enforcers. Is it their responsibility to rule. How did a thousand year social order suddenly collapse so quickly? The TRUE laziness is that of the upper class who live in slovenly opulence and are unwilling to reconfigure a broken order that benefited them the most. Instead of righting the wrong THEY created, they simply seek to replace us. No one acknowledges the radical changes that taking place in extremely small time periods. There are periods in history where centuries went by without any major changes. Dozens of generations focused on the same form of labour with little need to adapt. large changes that did take place were slow and were adapted to. The industrial revolution set in motion rapid and brutal changes birthing modernity. The 19th century was a brutal period of revolutions and continental wars. The 20th century was bloodier. The ever increasing changes since the 1960s are not stopping. The need to adapt to new working environments is reaching insane extremes leaving newer jobs obsolete in half a generation. Today's coders and computer techs are hired to create AI that will replace them. What do they do afterwards? Today, a young person can accumulate an education worth decades of working hours for a field that may be obsolete within a few years of them finishing their education. This liberal market refuses to adapt these people to the changes and squeezes them for all their worth through zero contract hours, no sick pay and the threat of no work after returning from maternity leave. Calling people 'lazy' because they want a living wage infuriates me beyond measure. The State should be intervening to either prevent the upheaval or alleviate it. It's hands are tired by Liberalism. We live in an Anarcho Tyranny. A weak state unwilling to enforce the law and preventing islamist gangs raping school children and unwilling to clam the divisions of the wealthy and the poor. It is pathetic.

Furthermore, the relationship between the worker and his/her labour has broken down. I believe Marx wrote about this and there's a lot of truth to it. Work in the past had a goal. Work provided status within community, it provided greater benefits such as property, it allowed for reproduction and investment in children. The poorest of people had far greater 'meaning' in their lives in a time of big families, church going, communal activity and collective work forces that could pool together and demand better representation in the workplace. Today, property is nearly impossible to attain, rent is abysmally high, wage growth hasn't been this slow since the 1800s, the bottom earners earn the same as they did 40 years ago DESPITE skyrocketing productivity and massive growth in the highest earners wealth. The gender war has led to broken families and broken communities. Capitalist-sponsored mass immigration has led to a completely incohesive alienated workforce that doesn't co operate and gains ever more growing tension as scarcity increases. Crime grows, institutions break down and the NHS is overloaded. It's beyond capacity and spending cannot keep up. What is also important to note is the radical changes that have taken place. What is the point of 'work' in a world without meaning? Most people will dull their senses with drugs, booze, high sugar foods and shitty entertainment. The British public are utterly demoralised and depressed. Who is responsible? The people in power. I'd like to say the people in power are lazy and naive, but their actions malicious. It is spite and arrogance. Rather than compromising with the native worker, and accept their small pitiful demands, the capitalist has taken off the mask of the endearing monopoly man and exposed their true intentions. Brexit was a small plea from the public to preserve some dignity and in return, this monstrosity is their rebuttal. They are doubling down on their moustache twirling villainy. We are to be replaced and the multi-ethnic travesty will prevent any proper working class unity. While the literal robber barons of the modern era rob us blind, the voters squabble over tranny rights and rhetoric. Basic bitch border policy is deemed a literal holocaust complete with 'concentration camps'. This is a fucking clown world.

On a side note to any other socialists who are still on this progressive globo third world band wagon. Why do you think Britain got to this point? Some of you may not know this, but Britain was once a strong socialist state to some degree. In the 1940s/50s, most of our industry was nationalised. More so than almost any other state in the world. We had powerful unions, growing workers rights (inspired by successful German Fascist policies) and crime rates almost 500% lower than today. There was no argument over race, no political arguments on cross dressers using toilets or proper pronouns. While feminism may have been a mild issue, the grand issue surrounded economics and class. Tories couldn't win these arguments. It was mass immigration from the commonwealth that broke this socialist expansion. While the ascendant progressives called for multi ethnic ubranism, the capitalist Tories called for immigration halts. It was this anxiety over foreigners which gave the Tories the landslides they needed to break the unions and found the philosophy of neo-liberalism. As Britain became more multi-ethnic, so to did it become more privatised, more liberal and more anarchic in its enforcement of social policy. The unions have never recovered, there are no worker collectives, there is no grand working class movement bubbling beneath the surface. Different races squabble over culture war scraps. The Marxist strategy in the 1960's abandoned class consciousness and dropped the working class in favour of radicalising middle class students. Today, the last vestige of 'communism' in Britain resides in champagne sipping hipsters, a cosmo-metro Twitterati and 'My Booky Wook' by Russell Brand. Socialism was an actual possibility under a homogeneous Anglo-Celtic socially cohesive nationalised state. Now we have this: Johnson... and an opposition led by ageing Labour backbencher who has aged a decade in under two years. Non-White leftists are celebrating the Tory cabinet for how 'brown' it is ignoring the fact that the big boot of capitalist oppression will be thrust on them by their new brown puppetted overlords. Whoopdee fucking doo. And what does antifa do? What do the junkie anarchists actually do? Do they protest outside the house of Epstein and his child peddling ring of blackmail plutocracy? Do they ransack of the offices of prominent Zionists who squeal for the West to bomb Iran back to the stone age? No, they crack the skulls of fence sitting centrists and rave about 'smashing the Fash' who have even less power than the Monster Raving Loony Party. Utter... fucking... clown world.

Onto their point regarding adoption of Chinese policy. The only policy they want to adopt is 'free-enterprise economic areas' within the UK. This is how the mind of the average Israel-funded lolberg Thatcherite works. They look at the smallest part of a grand picture and owe the success of the grand picture to the small part. China is a largely homogeneous nation with a billion people. They are an extremely cohesive society with far greater levels of conformity. There may be some mild ethnic differences between large expansive regions of China but they are the equivalent to an Englishman and a Scotsman with fewer cultural divides thanks to the top-down strict policies of the Communist government. The Chinese communist government has a leader in positions of authority in every major branch of government and has no term limits. He's effectively a dictator and the party rules with an iron fist. China is a command economy that is highly socialistic, highly undemocratic, censorious with state owned media and enforces a strict heavy handed zero tolerance social policy. Shanghai alone has half the population of Britain and has a similar homicide rate to the lowest crime areas in Europe. Chinese has a heavy shame policy for non-conformists and treats criminals with unrepentant brutality. This socialist government 'allows' - very important when I say 'allows' meaning you don't have a right and you should count your lucky stars you have it - specific regions to adopt liberalistic business practices. While liberal progressive Sweden lets Islamic third world communities molotov ambulances and throw grenades in police buildings, China forces millions of muslim Turkic's into camps where rigid conformity is demanded. Opposition results in brutal reprisal and collective punishment. Fasters at Ramadan are forced fed and people who close shops are forced to open them at gunpoint. While the majority of the British public suffered harsh austerity to the fraud and corruption of City of London bankers, the bankers received bonuses and were bailed out with taxpayers money. In China, fraudsters are executed, replaced and other banks and businesses are forced at gunpoint to pay for the mistakes of other banks. They do NOT fuck around. These Thatcherites have the audacity to claim they are adopting 'successful' policies ignoring the fact that a much larger picture and deeper philosophy is what built China. They think having tax haven regions in the UK will bring about the same success as a nation that executes drug dealers and sells their organs. It is the dumbest shit I have ever read. The treatise is not a real economic policy. It was a publicity campaign from the writers to gain traction within the party whom Johnson brought on board because he hasn't got a single solitary fucking clue what he is doing. He has no plan, no principles and no backbone. He will adopt a policy based on a half-baked treatise cooked up by Etonite grifters funded by a spiteful elite still stinging from a public rejection of their globalist ivory tower. Also, an Israeli ambassador (I think) was secretly recorded telling a whistleblower that Johnson was a fool who was essentially wrapped around their finger. Then again, so is every other politician in parliament. The two largest lobby groups in the UK are the 'Conservative Friends of Israel' and ... yes... the 'Labour Friends of Israel'. But remember guys, it's the spooky 4D chess-playing Russians we have to worry about meddling in our elections. Sure, sure.

Johnson is on the 'global Britain' Bandwagon. He will prioritise economic competitiveness over other concerns, and hope that his charisma and the 'war time' spirit of leaving the EU will carry him through. It is a kind of reversion to trying to distract the masses as Blair and Cameron did. It might work short term but it will fail spectacularly long term. His bombastic speech, his hiring of the LEAVE campaign team as his PR shows he intends to begin his leadership with a swift general election. I expect it to happen within the next month before the October 31st Brexit deadline because I strongly doubt he intends to leave on the set date. If he calls a General Election after the deadline without leaving, he is fucked. If he calls a General Election after leaving, he may also be fucked as this would give away his only negotiating card with the Brexit Party who may run against the Tories in competitive seats. He will likely call an election before the deadline, negotiate a compromise with the Brexit Party to not run in certain seats, and then not leave on the deadline by claiming that it was not him that promised to leave on the date. It's also plausible but very unlikely that he will leave the EU on the deadline and this action will dissolve the Brexit Party and allow for a Tory victory. The latter possibility is ONLY possibly in large part due to the utter lacklustre opposition of the Corbyn government.

As an accelerationist, you all probably know that I want Corbyn in 10 Downing Street. I've had my eye on him since the Labour party leadership election rules were changed allowing for this 30 year backbencher to take part in the leadership race. I knew he'd win and he did not disappoint when he took charge. He came out of swinging. He was a charming, unrepentant socialist and didn't give a fuck about the opinions of journo's. He took every round by the elites with a smirk and built this rather odd grandpa werzel image which hid his deeply fanatical tankie ideals. I actually warmed to the son of a bitch but one accusation stung more than any other and seriously hurt his prestige: 'muh anti-semitism'. The treatment of Corbyn isn't that much different to what leftists do to Nationalists so while I don't sympathise, I nonetheless can't stand the lies. This is the ONE accusation he acted defensively with. It exposes who holds real power and Labour's response of calling the Tories 'Islamophobic' fell on deaf ears. For two years, Zionist power structures embedded in every part of government, finance and media have attacked him relentlessly and it's done real damage. The public also doesn't trust him, or Labour on immigration so he isn't able to get votes from Northerners or the working class. Boomers hate him. So while the Tories are in the worst shape they have ever been in a century, with the the most childish twat imaginable in charge, using the strategy of Thatcherite wankers who think China is a global power because it lets a street in Shanghai sell knock-off Apple merch; the Labour party isn't capable of opposing them.

This is the state of affairs we are currently in. On the one side, we have a rabidly anti-white Labour party with some decent socialist policies that can alleviate some working class issues, on the other, we have a malicious spiteful capitalist class hellbent on punishing natives for Brexit by mass importing the third world and pissing on what's left of the dismally small workers rights we once held dear. And then likely sell off the NHS after it becomes insolvent.

There is a silver lining in this. If Boris does call an early General Election, I believe that parliament will not only be hung (No singular party having a majority of seats) but I also believe they may not even be able to form a coalition. This in my opinion would be the best case scenario. This scenario will show the absolute illegitimacy of liberal democracy. It will single-handed end the bullshit era of 'Hope' and birth the true era of 'Despair'. That is fervent ground for a truly radical, revolutionary spirit.

TL;DR - Read it you lazy bint. You can't summarise this level of political intrigue.

Napsáno Tik-Tok, 26.07.2019 at 03:45

Interesting points made. I agree on several of your points but a few I would contest.

UK is in a huge skills shortage currently in Doctors, Engineers, nurses etc. A lot of these jobs can be filled by skilled and willing workers from abroad who actually contribute to the economy far more positively. It's easy to look at right wing papers like the mail and believe 'ALL IMMIGRANTS=BAD' when in fact most come here are skilled and educated looking for jobs generally in areas that are in need. People are employed based on their skills not whether they are 'british so deserve the job more.

The point about Unions is wrong. Britain was a struggling industrial nation by the 60's and even in the 70's as the sick man of Europe. The reason why? the centralised industries essentially controlled by unions that can cause mass disruption with huge strikes for weeks on end. Like or hate thatcher she at least reduced the power of the unions. Nationalised indsutries were barely making a profit at that point and only open due to government bailouts.

Johnson is a Globalist yes but Britain cannot relive the days of Empire and glory of being a global superpower. Europe is our future the EU is not.

Napsáno lsilorien, 26.07.2019 at 04:06

UK is in a huge skills shortage currently in Doctors, Engineers, nurses etc. A lot of these jobs can be filled by skilled and willing workers from abroad who actually contribute to the economy far more positively. It's easy to look at right wing papers like the mail and believe 'ALL IMMIGRANTS=BAD' when in fact most come here are skilled and educated looking for jobs generally in areas that are in need. People are employed based on their skills not whether they are 'british so deserve the job more.

Ironically, you claim I read too many 'rite wing papa's' but repeat the most stale neo-liberal talking points. Inability to staff the NHS and infrastructure renewal is a myth. Why were British Hospitals able to staff themselves once but unable to do so overtime? What happened? Do you think we didn't have hospitals prior to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMT_Empire_Windrush#West_Indian_immigrants? Do you think we didn't have nurses or doctors prior to Caribbean or Indian immigration?

Here are two very important sets of statistics:

Citovat:

In 1948 across England and Wales there were 377 hospital management committees, and 36 teaching hospitals, each with its own board of governors. There were also 146 local health authorities, running health centres, ambulances services and other community services, and 140 executive councils, managing general practices, NHS dentistry, pharmacists and opticians.[1] The new service instantly became Britain's third largest employer with around 364,000 staff across England and Wales. These included 9,000 full-time doctors, 19,000 professional and technical staff (including 2,800 physiotherapists, 1,600 laboratory technicians and 2,000 radiographers), 25,000 administrative and clerical staff, 149,000 nurses and midwives (23,000 of whom were part-time), and 128,000 ancillary staff (catering, laundry, cleaning and maintenance).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_National_Health_Service_(England)

Citovat:

In 1950, it was estimated there were no more than 20,000 non-White residents in the United Kingdom, mainly in England; almost all born overseas.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_African_presence_in_London

Most of these non-white people either worked on the docks, worked as servants to wealthy people or were middle men for business between colonies and the Empire. They did not staff hospitals until the 1960s and not in great numbers after then either. They certainly weren't doctors or engineers. They didn't participate in the post-war mass infrastructure builds. It simply isn't true and no evidence backs this.

Here's another important factoid:

Citovat:

In 1948 it was estimated there was a shortage of 48,000 nurses. By 1952 the situation improved, figures show there were 245,000 whole time equivalent nurses.

https://www.nursingtimes.net/the-birth-of-the-nhs-july-5th-1948/441954.article

In 1948, the NHS had around 150,000 nurses and in under a decade had over a quarter of a million. How did they do this? We're so lazy and slovenly, how did we fill these places without immigrants? Maybe.. just maybe.. your neo-liberal talking point is historically inaccurate and propaganda bullshit. As an example, Nursing education was administered by the NHS itself in hospital-based schools. It was subsidised by the state and people could learn an important social skill, gain respect within their homogeneous community and earn a good wage. Large government funded campaigns strongly advertised for workers and people applied. It's fucking magic, old bean. It's almost like the state has enormous power and can do incredible things. Who would have guessed? Now why did we become more dependent on foreign workers? Oh, is it because we shut down the hospital schools, privatised the education, never kept their wages up with inflation and cost of living, forced them to do horrifically long shifts with no breaks, replaced their prestige and authority on wards with middle management and overtime handed over the educational costs to the workers themselves and made nursing not only a diploma level requirement but today is now a a degree level requirement. Or is it because we're just soooooo lazy, mang? The final nail in the coffin occurred two years ago when the state cut off the paltry last amount of subsidisation for nursing in the UK. The only people in the country who can afford to become a nurse are the middle class. Why would the middle class pay an enormous amount of money for a degree to work a stressful, demoralising job with long hours, no breaks and little pay and incur huge debts from their education? Overtime, the NHS is slowly being sold off and privatised and none of these useless middle management want to train staff. It's far easier and cheaper for them to just tell the government to import them from elsewhere and threaten to deport them if they want a better pay.

In conclusion, the NHS staff at its birth was employed almost exclusively from the working class, their education was state funded, they gained high social status within the community for their work and paid a good wage allowing for strong social mobility. It worked. They could fill positions with ease in extremely small time spans. That is all gone now. Like these FILTHY Thatcherite neo-lib scum, you never ask why. You project this bigoted anti-white/anti-anglo-celtic view that we are lazy. It assumes an incredibly naive view that power rests in the lower classes and not the top classes who pull levers of the machine that guides policy.

Napsáno lsilorien, 26.07.2019 at 04:06

not whether they are 'british so deserve the job more

If they are British, they deserve the job more. This isn't up for negotiation. Don't come to my country and tell me my people are equal to yours when it comes to employment. I don't tell you or your people to make way for mine, so don't tell mine that we should make way for yours. That attitude alone deserves deportation. We don't owe you or anyone anything and I have no doubt your people feel the same in their lands. If you are a fellow Anglo-Celt, then you need to grow a spine and stand up for your people. Non one else expresses this view outside middle class westerners.

Napsáno lsilorien, 26.07.2019 at 04:06

The point about Unions is wrong. Britain was a struggling industrial nation by the 60's and even in the 70's as the sick man of Europe. The reason why? the centralised industries essentially controlled by unions that can cause mass disruption with huge strikes for weeks on end. Like or hate thatcher she at least reduced the power of the unions. Nationalised industries were barely making a profit at that point and only open due to government bailouts.

Struggling nation? Sick man of Europe. You accuse me of Reading 'right wing papers' and you repeat literal Daily Mail'esque Thatcherite talking points. You dirty hypocrite. Most of these strikes occurred because people wanted to be paid a proper wage. Older miners that couldn't work down below had hours cut. They worked their entire lives doing back breaking work and the state is going to cut them off? Miners weren't having that. Big business colludes and collectivises all the time and lobby's state intervention for better profit. Why can't workers do the same? Why are we told to be hyper-individualistic and self-reliant but big corp gets a tasty state pay cheque, tax reductions and bonuses even when they fail? We closed coal mining and bought coal from China, Russia and the US. As usual, neo-liberal policy has little hindsight and is usually committed to these insane policies because donors and Tory friends have money to make on the deals. Overtime, the price of coal has risen and we're dependent on importing it for the industries that still use it. The need for coal has dwindled but why is this better than having our own vast industry doing it ourselves? Who cares if it runs at a loss? We can sell it abroad. Current energy costs also run at a loss but we have no negotiating card with other nations who know we have little domestic production. The closures of these industries collapsed entire economies across the UK and many of these regions have never recovered. Regions in Wales are riddled with empty homes, destitution and rampant drug abuse. The costs of this far exceed the costs of running these industries. The social damage is unprecedented. None of it makes any sense unless you understand that private interests desired this for private gain. It was not in the national interest socially or economically. Strikes occurred, as they should, but weren't as rampant as your neo-lib masters claim.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_strikes

Which is better? A dying neo-lib economy based on decadent international finance, zero contract hours and rampant debt, or a national economy which preserves communities and gives meaning to people? Do you not want an economy which is based on cohesion, national interest and national growth for the people, and not CEO's? Neo-lib wealth from privatisation was a short term stimulus but a long term loss. The solution was not to sell everything off and socially engineer the working class into thinking they have no right or place to seek better wages and conditions. The solution was to find what works and what doesn't. Thatcherite policies were spiteful and malicious benefiting a few but harming entire sections of Britain which bred the North/South divide. Northerners are just as much my brothers as Southerners, it's a bullshit divide that aids this individualistic alienation that prevents class consciousness. This cucked attitude isn't good for us or as a nation. It's neo-liberal propaganda. When the financial industry collapsed in '08, they were bailed out with $15 trillion. Where does this magic money come from? Why is manufacturing industry which builds national pride and produces regional growth considered worse than a debt ridden financial sector prone to total catastrophe and meltdown affecting the entire nation? Something like 10% of our GDP is due to money laundering in the City of London. I am not kidding. Do you think that is more sustainable than self-reliant, cheap production industry? It's really obvious. The financial sector is in charge and gets big daddy state benefits while the rest of us get fucked.

Stop thinking like a liberal cuck and start thinking in systems and collectives. They do it, so why can't you? Would you rather preserve a Northern town of 100,000 for cheap or bailout fraudulent bankers who quite literally gamble with your savings? And don't answer with some fence-sitting 'Neither'. The State is an incredible focal point of power and wealth, it is capable of great things and is held back by these liberals who only want it for themselves. The state is ours, it's the avatar of the People and it should NOT be in the hands of cosmopolitan financial internationalists who sell off our thousand year social order at a global auction house.

Boris is the true king of the seven kingdoms!

Napsáno Tik-Tok, 26.07.2019 at 08:43

Napsáno lsilorien, 26.07.2019 at 04:06

UK is in a huge skills shortage currently in Doctors, Engineers, nurses etc. A lot of these jobs can be filled by skilled and willing workers from abroad who actually contribute to the economy far more positively. It's easy to look at right wing papers like the mail and believe 'ALL IMMIGRANTS=BAD' when in fact most come here are skilled and educated looking for jobs generally in areas that are in need. People are employed based on their skills not whether they are 'british so deserve the job more.

Ironically, you claim I read too many 'rite wing papa's' but repeat the most stale neo-liberal talking points. Inability to staff the NHS and infrastructure renewal is a myth. Why were British Hospitals able to staff themselves once but unable to do so overtime? What happened? Do you think we didn't have hospitals prior to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMT_Empire_Windrush#West_Indian_immigrants? Do you think we didn't have nurses or doctors prior to Caribbean or Indian immigration?

Here are two very important sets of statistics:

Citovat:

In 1948 across England and Wales there were 377 hospital management committees, and 36 teaching hospitals, each with its own board of governors. There were also 146 local health authorities, running health centres, ambulances services and other community services, and 140 executive councils, managing general practices, NHS dentistry, pharmacists and opticians.[1] The new service instantly became Britain's third largest employer with around 364,000 staff across England and Wales. These included 9,000 full-time doctors, 19,000 professional and technical staff (including 2,800 physiotherapists, 1,600 laboratory technicians and 2,000 radiographers), 25,000 administrative and clerical staff, 149,000 nurses and midwives (23,000 of whom were part-time), and 128,000 ancillary staff (catering, laundry, cleaning and maintenance).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_National_Health_Service_(England)

Citovat:

In 1950, it was estimated there were no more than 20,000 non-White residents in the United Kingdom, mainly in England; almost all born overseas.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_African_presence_in_London

Most of these non-white people either worked on the docks, worked as servants to wealthy people or were middle men for business between colonies and the Empire. They did not staff hospitals until the 1960s and not in great numbers after then either. They certainly weren't doctors or engineers. They didn't participate in the post-war mass infrastructure builds. It simply isn't true and no evidence backs this.

Here's another important factoid:

Citovat:

In 1948 it was estimated there was a shortage of 48,000 nurses. By 1952 the situation improved, figures show there were 245,000 whole time equivalent nurses.

https://www.nursingtimes.net/the-birth-of-the-nhs-july-5th-1948/441954.article

In 1948, the NHS had around 150,000 nurses and in under a decade had over a quarter of a million. How did they do this? We're so lazy and slovenly, how did we fill these places without immigrants? Maybe.. just maybe.. your neo-liberal talking point is historically inaccurate and propaganda bullshit. As an example, Nursing education was administered by the NHS itself in hospital-based schools. It was subsidised by the state and people could learn an important social skill, gain respect within their homogeneous community and earn a good wage. Large government funded campaigns strongly advertised for workers and people applied. It's fucking magic, old bean. It's almost like the state has enormous power and can do incredible things. Who would have guessed? Now why did we become more dependent on foreign workers? Oh, is it because we shut down the hospital schools, privatised the education, never kept their wages up with inflation and cost of living, forced them to do horrifically long shifts with no breaks, replaced their prestige and authority on wards with middle management and overtime handed over the educational costs to the workers themselves and made nursing not only a diploma level requirement but today is now a a degree level requirement. Or is it because we're just soooooo lazy, mang? The final nail in the coffin occurred two years ago when the state cut off the paltry last amount of subsidisation for nursing in the UK. The only people in the country who can afford to become a nurse are the middle class. Why would the middle class pay an enormous amount of money for a degree to work a stressful, demoralising job with long hours, no breaks and little pay and incur huge debts from their education? Overtime, the NHS is slowly being sold off and privatised and none of these useless middle management want to train staff. It's far easier and cheaper for them to just tell the government to import them from elsewhere and threaten to deport them if they want a better pay.

In conclusion, the NHS staff at its birth was employed almost exclusively from the working class, their education was state funded, they gained high social status within the community for their work and paid a good wage allowing for strong social mobility. It worked. They could fill positions with ease in extremely small time spans. That is all gone now. Like these FILTHY Thatcherite neo-lib scum, you never ask why. You project this bigoted anti-white/anti-anglo-celtic view that we are lazy. It assumes an incredibly naive view that power rests in the lower classes and not the top classes who pull levers of the machine that guides policy.

Napsáno lsilorien, 26.07.2019 at 04:06

not whether they are 'british so deserve the job more

If they are British, they deserve the job more. This isn't up for negotiation. Don't come to my country and tell me my people are equal to yours when it comes to employment. I don't tell you or your people to make way for mine, so don't tell mine that we should make way for yours. That attitude alone deserves deportation. We don't owe you or anyone anything and I have no doubt your people feel the same in their lands. If you are a fellow Anglo-Celt, then you need to grow a spine and stand up for your people. Non one else expresses this view outside middle class westerners.

Napsáno lsilorien, 26.07.2019 at 04:06

The point about Unions is wrong. Britain was a struggling industrial nation by the 60's and even in the 70's as the sick man of Europe. The reason why? the centralised industries essentially controlled by unions that can cause mass disruption with huge strikes for weeks on end. Like or hate thatcher she at least reduced the power of the unions. Nationalised industries were barely making a profit at that point and only open due to government bailouts.

Struggling nation? Sick man of Europe. You accuse me of Reading 'right wing papers' and you repeat literal Daily Mail'esque Thatcherite talking points. You dirty hypocrite. Most of these strikes occurred because people wanted to be paid a proper wage. Older miners that couldn't work down below had hours cut. They worked their entire lives doing back breaking work and the state is going to cut them off? Miners weren't having that. Big business colludes and collectivises all the time and lobby's state intervention for better profit. Why can't workers do the same? Why are we told to be hyper-individualistic and self-reliant but big corp gets a tasty state pay cheque, tax reductions and bonuses even when they fail? We closed coal mining and bought coal from China, Russia and the US. As usual, neo-liberal policy has little hindsight and is usually committed to these insane policies because donors and Tory friends have money to make on the deals. Overtime, the price of coal has risen and we're dependent on importing it for the industries that still use it. The need for coal has dwindled but why is this better than having our own vast industry doing it ourselves? Who cares if it runs at a loss? We can sell it abroad. Current energy costs also run at a loss but we have no negotiating card with other nations who know we have little domestic production. The closures of these industries collapsed entire economies across the UK and many of these regions have never recovered. Regions in Wales are riddled with empty homes, destitution and rampant drug abuse. The costs of this far exceed the costs of running these industries. The social damage is unprecedented. None of it makes any sense unless you understand that private interests desired this for private gain. It was not in the national interest socially or economically. Strikes occurred, as they should, but weren't as rampant as your neo-lib masters claim.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_strikes

Which is better? A dying neo-lib economy based on decadent international finance, zero contract hours and rampant debt, or a national economy which preserves communities and gives meaning to people? Do you not want an economy which is based on cohesion, national interest and national growth for the people, and not CEO's? Neo-lib wealth from privatisation was a short term stimulus but a long term loss. The solution was not to sell everything off and socially engineer the working class into thinking they have no right or place to seek better wages and conditions. The solution was to find what works and what doesn't. Thatcherite policies were spiteful and malicious benefiting a few but harming entire sections of Britain which bred the North/South divide. Northerners are just as much my brothers as Southerners, it's a bullshit divide that aids this individualistic alienation that prevents class consciousness. This cucked attitude isn't good for us or as a nation. It's neo-liberal propaganda. When the financial industry collapsed in '08, they were bailed out with $15 trillion. Where does this magic money come from? Why is manufacturing industry which builds national pride and produces regional growth considered worse than a debt ridden financial sector prone to total catastrophe and meltdown affecting the entire nation? Something like 10% of our GDP is due to money laundering in the City of London. I am not kidding. Do you think that is more sustainable than self-reliant, cheap production industry? It's really obvious. The financial sector is in charge and gets big daddy state benefits while the rest of us get fucked.

Stop thinking like a liberal cuck and start thinking in systems and collectives. They do it, so why can't you? Would you rather preserve a Northern town of 100,000 for cheap or bailout fraudulent bankers who quite literally gamble with your savings? And don't answer with some fence-sitting 'Neither'. The State is an incredible focal point of power and wealth, it is capable of great things and is held back by these liberals who only want it for themselves. The state is ours, it's the avatar of the People and it should NOT be in the hands of cosmopolitan financial internationalists who sell off our thousand year social order at a global auction house.

Don't be offensive with your points. You clearly know and understand more, i was just voicing some things I've read.

Napsáno Tik-Tok, 26.07.2019 at 03:45

Boris Johnson will be one of the worst Prime Minister's in our nations history. As it stands, the Tories are declaring an all out war on the public and will govern us with the staunchest Thatcherite figures among the Tory Party. There is nothing 'conservative', 'traditional' or 'nationalist' about Johnson or his ilk. They are enemies of the people, enemies of the 'West' and explicit enemies of both the worker and the native Anglo-Celt. I will explain why and it's not because they are Brexiteers as some suggest in this thread.

The first action Johnson took as Prime Minister was to rip up Theresa May's immigration plans which included the 2010 pledge to reduce net immigration to 50k a year. While May and the Tories have never been serious about their pledge, May did foster some brazen and public anti-immigration rhetoric while never properly enforcing it. Her 'Hostile Environment' policies were slated by leftists, but they only affected a few hundred immigrants per policy and at most increased the costs of attaining citizenship. It did little to affect immigration and was just a publicity stunt to keep the Tory base on their side. By tearing this pledge apart, Johnson is taking off the mask and showing the true face of mass immigration as a capitalist venture. Johnson plans to adopt the infamous 'Australian Points System' which the likes of Farage and other lolbergs flaunt like it's the holy grail. A simple comparison of some statistics shows the problem with this 'wonderful' policy:

Citovat:

2018: Australia net migration = 237k, pop. 24.6m
2018: UK net migration = 258k, pop. 66m

The Australian points system is unlimited. If adopted in its entirety without limitations - which is likely as Johnson refuses to answer whether he would set limits - UK net immigration could triple to 750k a year. In comparison, Corbyn is likely to the social right of Johnson in this policy. Even Corbyn isn't this insane to import almost a million people a year.

Johnson also wants to give an amnesty to the million+ illegals currently living in the UK. This is not the actions of a so-called Conservative. In some eyes, it could be called 'progressive' but it's intentions are Thatcherite in nature and are malicious towards the native working class bloc. It also shows that 'Capitalism' and 'Progressivism' go hand in hand. Socialism and the Social Right are far more complimentary to one another.

Johnson and his cabinet follow a strategy written in the treatise 'Britannia Unchained' and will likely add the Trumpian dialect coupled with Johnson's bombastic mannerisms. It's a filthy, dirty, ultra-capital elite plan of action.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Britannia_Unchained

Citovat:

"The text sets out their vision for the United Kingdom's future as a leading player in the global economy, arguing that Britain needs to adopt a far-reaching form of free market economics, with fewer employment laws and suggesting the United Kingdom should learn lessons from the business and economic practices of other countries, including Canada, Australia and the tiger economies of the Far East like China and Singapore.[1][2] All five of the co-authors became part of the cabinet of Prime Minister Boris Johnson in 2019."

Key words: 'Free Market', 'Fewer Employment Laws'.
Translation: 'Fuck Whitey and fuck working people'

The comparison to China is the most insulting part and I'll get into that later. Here's a really painful example of the glaring hole they have when it comes to policy:

Citovat:

"On education, the authors lament the relatively low number of students who study mathematics at A Level which they say is 15%, contrasting it with Japan where 85% study the subject at a similar level."

This is true but the authors never ask why. Why is maths more important in Japan but not in the UK? A century ago, Britons were top in this subject and one of the worlds largest producers. What happened? Maths is considered high status in Japan but not in Britain. Who sets the tone and agenda of who or what is high status in the UK? High status in the UK is taken by the most loudmouth obnoxious virtue signallers or useless drug-addicted celebrities. That was a product of industry, subsidised by the state. 'Liberation' politics dictates education and the upper class never fought it. They placated and wholly adopted it. They promoted it and yet they have the nerve to claim it is the fault of the working class for policies THEY set upon us. These policies were rejected by the public and took decades and multi-generational social engineering to embed within the social structure. This was top-down and the people at the top are blaming those at the bottom. Disgusting.

Citovat:

"The British are among the worst idlers in the world. We work among the lowest hours, we retire early and our productivity is poor. Whereas Indian children aspire to be doctors or businessmen, the British are more interested in football and pop music"

This is astonishing bigotry that would NEVER be written about any other non-white ethnic group. Non-white unemployment is double that of native Brits. The message in the treatise is very clear: Replace Britons with foreign workers that are more compliant, more willing to work for less and are less likely to form unions or worker collectives that demand better conditions. This is downright treasonous rhetoric. Again, the question is never asked why this lack of 'productivity' is occurring. Why did one of the hardest working people in the world with the highest work ethic suddenly become like this? The masses have little say in politics. The upper class and their financial power has the last say. They are the leaders and the enforcers. Is it their responsibility to rule. How did a thousand year social order suddenly collapse so quickly? The TRUE laziness is that of the upper class who live in slovenly opulence and are unwilling to reconfigure a broken order that benefited them the most. Instead of righting the wrong THEY created, they simply seek to replace us. No one acknowledges the radical changes that taking place in extremely small time periods. There are periods in history where centuries went by without any major changes. Dozens of generations focused on the same form of labour with little need to adapt. large changes that did take place were slow and were adapted to. The industrial revolution set in motion rapid and brutal changes birthing modernity. The 19th century was a brutal period of revolutions and continental wars. The 20th century was bloodier. The ever increasing changes since the 1960s are not stopping. The need to adapt to new working environments is reaching insane extremes leaving newer jobs obsolete in half a generation. Today's coders and computer techs are hired to create AI that will replace them. What do they do afterwards? Today, a young person can accumulate an education worth decades of working hours for a field that may be obsolete within a few years of them finishing their education. This liberal market refuses to adapt these people to the changes and squeezes them for all their worth through zero contract hours, no sick pay and the threat of no work after returning from maternity leave. Calling people 'lazy' because they want a living wage infuriates me beyond measure. The State should be intervening to either prevent the upheaval or alleviate it. It's hands are tired by Liberalism. We live in an Anarcho Tyranny. A weak state unwilling to enforce the law and preventing islamist gangs raping school children and unwilling to clam the divisions of the wealthy and the poor. It is pathetic.

Furthermore, the relationship between the worker and his/her labour has broken down. I believe Marx wrote about this and there's a lot of truth to it. Work in the past had a goal. Work provided status within community, it provided greater benefits such as property, it allowed for reproduction and investment in children. The poorest of people had far greater 'meaning' in their lives in a time of big families, church going, communal activity and collective work forces that could pool together and demand better representation in the workplace. Today, property is nearly impossible to attain, rent is abysmally high, wage growth hasn't been this slow since the 1800s, the bottom earners earn the same as they did 40 years ago DESPITE skyrocketing productivity and massive growth in the highest earners wealth. The gender war has led to broken families and broken communities. Capitalist-sponsored mass immigration has led to a completely incohesive alienated workforce that doesn't co operate and gains ever more growing tension as scarcity increases. Crime grows, institutions break down and the NHS is overloaded. It's beyond capacity and spending cannot keep up. What is also important to note is the radical changes that have taken place. What is the point of 'work' in a world without meaning? Most people will dull their senses with drugs, booze, high sugar foods and shitty entertainment. The British public are utterly demoralised and depressed. Who is responsible? The people in power. I'd like to say the people in power are lazy and naive, but their actions malicious. It is spite and arrogance. Rather than compromising with the native worker, and accept their small pitiful demands, the capitalist has taken off the mask of the endearing monopoly man and exposed their true intentions. Brexit was a small plea from the public to preserve some dignity and in return, this monstrosity is their rebuttal. They are doubling down on their moustache twirling villainy. We are to be replaced and the multi-ethnic travesty will prevent any proper working class unity. While the literal robber barons of the modern era rob us blind, the voters squabble over tranny rights and rhetoric. Basic bitch border policy is deemed a literal holocaust complete with 'concentration camps'. This is a fucking clown world.

On a side note to any other socialists who are still on this progressive globo third world band wagon. Why do you think Britain got to this point? Some of you may not know this, but Britain was once a strong socialist state to some degree. In the 1940s/50s, most of our industry was nationalised. More so than almost any other state in the world. We had powerful unions, growing workers rights (inspired by successful German Fascist policies) and crime rates almost 500% lower than today. There was no argument over race, no political arguments on cross dressers using toilets or proper pronouns. While feminism may have been a mild issue, the grand issue surrounded economics and class. Tories couldn't win these arguments. It was mass immigration from the commonwealth that broke this socialist expansion. While the ascendant progressives called for multi ethnic ubranism, the capitalist Tories called for immigration halts. It was this anxiety over foreigners which gave the Tories the landslides they needed to break the unions and found the philosophy of neo-liberalism. As Britain became more multi-ethnic, so to did it become more privatised, more liberal and more anarchic in its enforcement of social policy. The unions have never recovered, there are no worker collectives, there is no grand working class movement bubbling beneath the surface. Different races squabble over culture war scraps. The Marxist strategy in the 1960's abandoned class consciousness and dropped the working class in favour of radicalising middle class students. Today, the last vestige of 'communism' in Britain resides in champagne sipping hipsters, a cosmo-metro Twitterati and 'My Booky Wook' by Russell Brand. Socialism was an actual possibility under a homogeneous Anglo-Celtic socially cohesive nationalised state. Now we have this: Johnson... and an opposition led by ageing Labour backbencher who has aged a decade in under two years. Non-White leftists are celebrating the Tory cabinet for how 'brown' it is ignoring the fact that the big boot of capitalist oppression will be thrust on them by their new brown puppetted overlords. Whoopdee fucking doo. And what does antifa do? What do the junkie anarchists actually do? Do they protest outside the house of Epstein and his child peddling ring of blackmail plutocracy? Do they ransack of the offices of prominent Zionists who squeal for the West to bomb Iran back to the stone age? No, they crack the skulls of fence sitting centrists and rave about 'smashing the Fash' who have even less power than the Monster Raving Loony Party. Utter... fucking... clown world.

Onto their point regarding adoption of Chinese policy. The only policy they want to adopt is 'free-enterprise economic areas' within the UK. This is how the mind of the average Israel-funded lolberg Thatcherite works. They look at the smallest part of a grand picture and owe the success of the grand picture to the small part. China is a largely homogeneous nation with a billion people. They are an extremely cohesive society with far greater levels of conformity. There may be some mild ethnic differences between large expansive regions of China but they are the equivalent to an Englishman and a Scotsman with fewer cultural divides thanks to the top-down strict policies of the Communist government. The Chinese communist government has a leader in positions of authority in every major branch of government and has no term limits. He's effectively a dictator and the party rules with an iron fist. China is a command economy that is highly socialistic, highly undemocratic, censorious with state owned media and enforces a strict heavy handed zero tolerance social policy. Shanghai alone has half the population of Britain and has a similar homicide rate to the lowest crime areas in Europe. Chinese has a heavy shame policy for non-conformists and treats criminals with unrepentant brutality. This socialist government 'allows' - very important when I say 'allows' meaning you don't have a right and you should count your lucky stars you have it - specific regions to adopt liberalistic business practices. While liberal progressive Sweden lets Islamic third world communities molotov ambulances and throw grenades in police buildings, China forces millions of muslim Turkic's into camps where rigid conformity is demanded. Opposition results in brutal reprisal and collective punishment. Fasters at Ramadan are forced fed and people who close shops are forced to open them at gunpoint. While the majority of the British public suffered harsh austerity to the fraud and corruption of City of London bankers, the bankers received bonuses and were bailed out with taxpayers money. In China, fraudsters are executed, replaced and other banks and businesses are forced at gunpoint to pay for the mistakes of other banks. They do NOT fuck around. These Thatcherites have the audacity to claim they are adopting 'successful' policies ignoring the fact that a much larger picture and deeper philosophy is what built China. They think having tax haven regions in the UK will bring about the same success as a nation that executes drug dealers and sells their organs. It is the dumbest shit I have ever read. The treatise is not a real economic policy. It was a publicity campaign from the writers to gain traction within the party whom Johnson brought on board because he hasn't got a single solitary fucking clue what he is doing. He has no plan, no principles and no backbone. He will adopt a policy based on a half-baked treatise cooked up by Etonite grifters funded by a spiteful elite still stinging from a public rejection of their globalist ivory tower. Also, an Israeli ambassador (I think) was secretly recorded telling a whistleblower that Johnson was a fool who was essentially wrapped around their finger. Then again, so is every other politician in parliament. The two largest lobby groups in the UK are the 'Conservative Friends of Israel' and ... yes... the 'Labour Friends of Israel'. But remember guys, it's the spooky 4D chess-playing Russians we have to worry about meddling in our elections. Sure, sure.

Johnson is on the 'global Britain' Bandwagon. He will prioritise economic competitiveness over other concerns, and hope that his charisma and the 'war time' spirit of leaving the EU will carry him through. It is a kind of reversion to trying to distract the masses as Blair and Cameron did. It might work short term but it will fail spectacularly long term. His bombastic speech, his hiring of the LEAVE campaign team as his PR shows he intends to begin his leadership with a swift general election. I expect it to happen within the next month before the October 31st Brexit deadline because I strongly doubt he intends to leave on the set date. If he calls a General Election after the deadline without leaving, he is fucked. If he calls a General Election after leaving, he may also be fucked as this would give away his only negotiating card with the Brexit Party who may run against the Tories in competitive seats. He will likely call an election before the deadline, negotiate a compromise with the Brexit Party to not run in certain seats, and then not leave on the deadline by claiming that it was not him that promised to leave on the date. It's also plausible but very unlikely that he will leave the EU on the deadline and this action will dissolve the Brexit Party and allow for a Tory victory. The latter possibility is ONLY possibly in large part due to the utter lacklustre opposition of the Corbyn government.

As an accelerationist, you all probably know that I want Corbyn in 10 Downing Street. I've had my eye on him since the Labour party leadership election rules were changed allowing for this 30 year backbencher to take part in the leadership race. I knew he'd win and he did not disappoint when he took charge. He came out of swinging. He was a charming, unrepentant socialist and didn't give a fuck about the opinions of journo's. He took every round by the elites with a smirk and built this rather odd grandpa werzel image which hid his deeply fanatical tankie ideals. I actually warmed to the son of a bitch but one accusation stung more than any other and seriously hurt his prestige: 'muh anti-semitism'. The treatment of Corbyn isn't that much different to what leftists do to Nationalists so while I don't sympathise, I nonetheless can't stand the lies. This is the ONE accusation he acted defensively with. It exposes who holds real power and Labour's response of calling the Tories 'Islamophobic' fell on deaf ears. For two years, Zionist power structures embedded in every part of government, finance and media have attacked him relentlessly and it's done real damage. The public also doesn't trust him, or Labour on immigration so he isn't able to get votes from Northerners or the working class. Boomers hate him. So while the Tories are in the worst shape they have ever been in a century, with the the most childish twat imaginable in charge, using the strategy of Thatcherite wankers who think China is a global power because it lets a street in Shanghai sell knock-off Apple merch; the Labour party isn't capable of opposing them.

This is the state of affairs we are currently in. On the one side, we have a rabidly anti-white Labour party with some decent socialist policies that can alleviate some working class issues, on the other, we have a malicious spiteful capitalist class hellbent on punishing natives for Brexit by mass importing the third world and pissing on what's left of the dismally small workers rights we once held dear. And then likely sell off the NHS after it becomes insolvent.

There is a silver lining in this. If Boris does call an early General Election, I believe that parliament will not only be hung (No singular party having a majority of seats) but I also believe they may not even be able to form a coalition. This in my opinion would be the best case scenario. This scenario will show the absolute illegitimacy of liberal democracy. It will single-handed end the bullshit era of 'Hope' and birth the true era of 'Despair'. That is fervent ground for a truly radical, revolutionary spirit.

TL;DR - Read it you lazy bint. You can't summarise this level of political intrigue.

yes

Learn to quote for god's sake

Napsáno Dave, 23.07.2019 at 06:26

#MAGA
(Make Anglo-saxons Great Again!)

Based and anglo pilled

Napsáno Tribune Aquila, 27.07.2019 at 19:23

Napsáno Tik-Tok, 26.07.2019 at 03:45

Boris Johnson will be one of the worst Prime Minister's in our nations history. As it stands, the Tories are declaring an all out war on the public and will govern us with the staunchest Thatcherite figures among the Tory Party. There is nothing 'conservative', 'traditional' or 'nationalist' about Johnson or his ilk. They are enemies of the people, enemies of the 'West' and explicit enemies of both the worker and the native Anglo-Celt. I will explain why and it's not because they are Brexiteers as some suggest in this thread.

The first action Johnson took as Prime Minister was to rip up Theresa May's immigration plans which included the 2010 pledge to reduce net immigration to 50k a year. While May and the Tories have never been serious about their pledge, May did foster some brazen and public anti-immigration rhetoric while never properly enforcing it. Her 'Hostile Environment' policies were slated by leftists, but they only affected a few hundred immigrants per policy and at most increased the costs of attaining citizenship. It did little to affect immigration and was just a publicity stunt to keep the Tory base on their side. By tearing this pledge apart, Johnson is taking off the mask and showing the true face of mass immigration as a capitalist venture. Johnson plans to adopt the infamous 'Australian Points System' which the likes of Farage and other lolbergs flaunt like it's the holy grail. A simple comparison of some statistics shows the problem with this 'wonderful' policy:

Citovat:

2018: Australia net migration = 237k, pop. 24.6m
2018: UK net migration = 258k, pop. 66m

The Australian points system is unlimited. If adopted in its entirety without limitations - which is likely as Johnson refuses to answer whether he would set limits - UK net immigration could triple to 750k a year. In comparison, Corbyn is likely to the social right of Johnson in this policy. Even Corbyn isn't this insane to import almost a million people a year.

Johnson also wants to give an amnesty to the million+ illegals currently living in the UK. This is not the actions of a so-called Conservative. In some eyes, it could be called 'progressive' but it's intentions are Thatcherite in nature and are malicious towards the native working class bloc. It also shows that 'Capitalism' and 'Progressivism' go hand in hand. Socialism and the Social Right are far more complimentary to one another.

Johnson and his cabinet follow a strategy written in the treatise 'Britannia Unchained' and will likely add the Trumpian dialect coupled with Johnson's bombastic mannerisms. It's a filthy, dirty, ultra-capital elite plan of action.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Britannia_Unchained

Citovat:

"The text sets out their vision for the United Kingdom's future as a leading player in the global economy, arguing that Britain needs to adopt a far-reaching form of free market economics, with fewer employment laws and suggesting the United Kingdom should learn lessons from the business and economic practices of other countries, including Canada, Australia and the tiger economies of the Far East like China and Singapore.[1][2] All five of the co-authors became part of the cabinet of Prime Minister Boris Johnson in 2019."

Key words: 'Free Market', 'Fewer Employment Laws'.
Translation: 'Fuck Whitey and fuck working people'

The comparison to China is the most insulting part and I'll get into that later. Here's a really painful example of the glaring hole they have when it comes to policy:

Citovat:

"On education, the authors lament the relatively low number of students who study mathematics at A Level which they say is 15%, contrasting it with Japan where 85% study the subject at a similar level."

This is true but the authors never ask why. Why is maths more important in Japan but not in the UK? A century ago, Britons were top in this subject and one of the worlds largest producers. What happened? Maths is considered high status in Japan but not in Britain. Who sets the tone and agenda of who or what is high status in the UK? High status in the UK is taken by the most loudmouth obnoxious virtue signallers or useless drug-addicted celebrities. That was a product of industry, subsidised by the state. 'Liberation' politics dictates education and the upper class never fought it. They placated and wholly adopted it. They promoted it and yet they have the nerve to claim it is the fault of the working class for policies THEY set upon us. These policies were rejected by the public and took decades and multi-generational social engineering to embed within the social structure. This was top-down and the people at the top are blaming those at the bottom. Disgusting.

Citovat:

"The British are among the worst idlers in the world. We work among the lowest hours, we retire early and our productivity is poor. Whereas Indian children aspire to be doctors or businessmen, the British are more interested in football and pop music"

This is astonishing bigotry that would NEVER be written about any other non-white ethnic group. Non-white unemployment is double that of native Brits. The message in the treatise is very clear: Replace Britons with foreign workers that are more compliant, more willing to work for less and are less likely to form unions or worker collectives that demand better conditions. This is downright treasonous rhetoric. Again, the question is never asked why this lack of 'productivity' is occurring. Why did one of the hardest working people in the world with the highest work ethic suddenly become like this? The masses have little say in politics. The upper class and their financial power has the last say. They are the leaders and the enforcers. Is it their responsibility to rule. How did a thousand year social order suddenly collapse so quickly? The TRUE laziness is that of the upper class who live in slovenly opulence and are unwilling to reconfigure a broken order that benefited them the most. Instead of righting the wrong THEY created, they simply seek to replace us. No one acknowledges the radical changes that taking place in extremely small time periods. There are periods in history where centuries went by without any major changes. Dozens of generations focused on the same form of labour with little need to adapt. large changes that did take place were slow and were adapted to. The industrial revolution set in motion rapid and brutal changes birthing modernity. The 19th century was a brutal period of revolutions and continental wars. The 20th century was bloodier. The ever increasing changes since the 1960s are not stopping. The need to adapt to new working environments is reaching insane extremes leaving newer jobs obsolete in half a generation. Today's coders and computer techs are hired to create AI that will replace them. What do they do afterwards? Today, a young person can accumulate an education worth decades of working hours for a field that may be obsolete within a few years of them finishing their education. This liberal market refuses to adapt these people to the changes and squeezes them for all their worth through zero contract hours, no sick pay and the threat of no work after returning from maternity leave. Calling people 'lazy' because they want a living wage infuriates me beyond measure. The State should be intervening to either prevent the upheaval or alleviate it. It's hands are tired by Liberalism. We live in an Anarcho Tyranny. A weak state unwilling to enforce the law and preventing islamist gangs raping school children and unwilling to clam the divisions of the wealthy and the poor. It is pathetic.

Furthermore, the relationship between the worker and his/her labour has broken down. I believe Marx wrote about this and there's a lot of truth to it. Work in the past had a goal. Work provided status within community, it provided greater benefits such as property, it allowed for reproduction and investment in children. The poorest of people had far greater 'meaning' in their lives in a time of big families, church going, communal activity and collective work forces that could pool together and demand better representation in the workplace. Today, property is nearly impossible to attain, rent is abysmally high, wage growth hasn't been this slow since the 1800s, the bottom earners earn the same as they did 40 years ago DESPITE skyrocketing productivity and massive growth in the highest earners wealth. The gender war has led to broken families and broken communities. Capitalist-sponsored mass immigration has led to a completely incohesive alienated workforce that doesn't co operate and gains ever more growing tension as scarcity increases. Crime grows, institutions break down and the NHS is overloaded. It's beyond capacity and spending cannot keep up. What is also important to note is the radical changes that have taken place. What is the point of 'work' in a world without meaning? Most people will dull their senses with drugs, booze, high sugar foods and shitty entertainment. The British public are utterly demoralised and depressed. Who is responsible? The people in power. I'd like to say the people in power are lazy and naive, but their actions malicious. It is spite and arrogance. Rather than compromising with the native worker, and accept their small pitiful demands, the capitalist has taken off the mask of the endearing monopoly man and exposed their true intentions. Brexit was a small plea from the public to preserve some dignity and in return, this monstrosity is their rebuttal. They are doubling down on their moustache twirling villainy. We are to be replaced and the multi-ethnic travesty will prevent any proper working class unity. While the literal robber barons of the modern era rob us blind, the voters squabble over tranny rights and rhetoric. Basic bitch border policy is deemed a literal holocaust complete with 'concentration camps'. This is a fucking clown world.

On a side note to any other socialists who are still on this progressive globo third world band wagon. Why do you think Britain got to this point? Some of you may not know this, but Britain was once a strong socialist state to some degree. In the 1940s/50s, most of our industry was nationalised. More so than almost any other state in the world. We had powerful unions, growing workers rights (inspired by successful German Fascist policies) and crime rates almost 500% lower than today. There was no argument over race, no political arguments on cross dressers using toilets or proper pronouns. While feminism may have been a mild issue, the grand issue surrounded economics and class. Tories couldn't win these arguments. It was mass immigration from the commonwealth that broke this socialist expansion. While the ascendant progressives called for multi ethnic ubranism, the capitalist Tories called for immigration halts. It was this anxiety over foreigners which gave the Tories the landslides they needed to break the unions and found the philosophy of neo-liberalism. As Britain became more multi-ethnic, so to did it become more privatised, more liberal and more anarchic in its enforcement of social policy. The unions have never recovered, there are no worker collectives, there is no grand working class movement bubbling beneath the surface. Different races squabble over culture war scraps. The Marxist strategy in the 1960's abandoned class consciousness and dropped the working class in favour of radicalising middle class students. Today, the last vestige of 'communism' in Britain resides in champagne sipping hipsters, a cosmo-metro Twitterati and 'My Booky Wook' by Russell Brand. Socialism was an actual possibility under a homogeneous Anglo-Celtic socially cohesive nationalised state. Now we have this: Johnson... and an opposition led by ageing Labour backbencher who has aged a decade in under two years. Non-White leftists are celebrating the Tory cabinet for how 'brown' it is ignoring the fact that the big boot of capitalist oppression will be thrust on them by their new brown puppetted overlords. Whoopdee fucking doo. And what does antifa do? What do the junkie anarchists actually do? Do they protest outside the house of Epstein and his child peddling ring of blackmail plutocracy? Do they ransack of the offices of prominent Zionists who squeal for the West to bomb Iran back to the stone age? No, they crack the skulls of fence sitting centrists and rave about 'smashing the Fash' who have even less power than the Monster Raving Loony Party. Utter... fucking... clown world.

Onto their point regarding adoption of Chinese policy. The only policy they want to adopt is 'free-enterprise economic areas' within the UK. This is how the mind of the average Israel-funded lolberg Thatcherite works. They look at the smallest part of a grand picture and owe the success of the grand picture to the small part. China is a largely homogeneous nation with a billion people. They are an extremely cohesive society with far greater levels of conformity. There may be some mild ethnic differences between large expansive regions of China but they are the equivalent to an Englishman and a Scotsman with fewer cultural divides thanks to the top-down strict policies of the Communist government. The Chinese communist government has a leader in positions of authority in every major branch of government and has no term limits. He's effectively a dictator and the party rules with an iron fist. China is a command economy that is highly socialistic, highly undemocratic, censorious with state owned media and enforces a strict heavy handed zero tolerance social policy. Shanghai alone has half the population of Britain and has a similar homicide rate to the lowest crime areas in Europe. Chinese has a heavy shame policy for non-conformists and treats criminals with unrepentant brutality. This socialist government 'allows' - very important when I say 'allows' meaning you don't have a right and you should count your lucky stars you have it - specific regions to adopt liberalistic business practices. While liberal progressive Sweden lets Islamic third world communities molotov ambulances and throw grenades in police buildings, China forces millions of muslim Turkic's into camps where rigid conformity is demanded. Opposition results in brutal reprisal and collective punishment. Fasters at Ramadan are forced fed and people who close shops are forced to open them at gunpoint. While the majority of the British public suffered harsh austerity to the fraud and corruption of City of London bankers, the bankers received bonuses and were bailed out with taxpayers money. In China, fraudsters are executed, replaced and other banks and businesses are forced at gunpoint to pay for the mistakes of other banks. They do NOT fuck around. These Thatcherites have the audacity to claim they are adopting 'successful' policies ignoring the fact that a much larger picture and deeper philosophy is what built China. They think having tax haven regions in the UK will bring about the same success as a nation that executes drug dealers and sells their organs. It is the dumbest shit I have ever read. The treatise is not a real economic policy. It was a publicity campaign from the writers to gain traction within the party whom Johnson brought on board because he hasn't got a single solitary fucking clue what he is doing. He has no plan, no principles and no backbone. He will adopt a policy based on a half-baked treatise cooked up by Etonite grifters funded by a spiteful elite still stinging from a public rejection of their globalist ivory tower. Also, an Israeli ambassador (I think) was secretly recorded telling a whistleblower that Johnson was a fool who was essentially wrapped around their finger. Then again, so is every other politician in parliament. The two largest lobby groups in the UK are the 'Conservative Friends of Israel' and ... yes... the 'Labour Friends of Israel'. But remember guys, it's the spooky 4D chess-playing Russians we have to worry about meddling in our elections. Sure, sure.

Johnson is on the 'global Britain' Bandwagon. He will prioritise economic competitiveness over other concerns, and hope that his charisma and the 'war time' spirit of leaving the EU will carry him through. It is a kind of reversion to trying to distract the masses as Blair and Cameron did. It might work short term but it will fail spectacularly long term. His bombastic speech, his hiring of the LEAVE campaign team as his PR shows he intends to begin his leadership with a swift general election. I expect it to happen within the next month before the October 31st Brexit deadline because I strongly doubt he intends to leave on the set date. If he calls a General Election after the deadline without leaving, he is fucked. If he calls a General Election after leaving, he may also be fucked as this would give away his only negotiating card with the Brexit Party who may run against the Tories in competitive seats. He will likely call an election before the deadline, negotiate a compromise with the Brexit Party to not run in certain seats, and then not leave on the deadline by claiming that it was not him that promised to leave on the date. It's also plausible but very unlikely that he will leave the EU on the deadline and this action will dissolve the Brexit Party and allow for a Tory victory. The latter possibility is ONLY possibly in large part due to the utter lacklustre opposition of the Corbyn government.

As an accelerationist, you all probably know that I want Corbyn in 10 Downing Street. I've had my eye on him since the Labour party leadership election rules were changed allowing for this 30 year backbencher to take part in the leadership race. I knew he'd win and he did not disappoint when he took charge. He came out of swinging. He was a charming, unrepentant socialist and didn't give a fuck about the opinions of journo's. He took every round by the elites with a smirk and built this rather odd grandpa werzel image which hid his deeply fanatical tankie ideals. I actually warmed to the son of a bitch but one accusation stung more than any other and seriously hurt his prestige: 'muh anti-semitism'. The treatment of Corbyn isn't that much different to what leftists do to Nationalists so while I don't sympathise, I nonetheless can't stand the lies. This is the ONE accusation he acted defensively with. It exposes who holds real power and Labour's response of calling the Tories 'Islamophobic' fell on deaf ears. For two years, Zionist power structures embedded in every part of government, finance and media have attacked him relentlessly and it's done real damage. The public also doesn't trust him, or Labour on immigration so he isn't able to get votes from Northerners or the working class. Boomers hate him. So while the Tories are in the worst shape they have ever been in a century, with the the most childish twat imaginable in charge, using the strategy of Thatcherite wankers who think China is a global power because it lets a street in Shanghai sell knock-off Apple merch; the Labour party isn't capable of opposing them.

This is the state of affairs we are currently in. On the one side, we have a rabidly anti-white Labour party with some decent socialist policies that can alleviate some working class issues, on the other, we have a malicious spiteful capitalist class hellbent on punishing natives for Brexit by mass importing the third world and pissing on what's left of the dismally small workers rights we once held dear. And then likely sell off the NHS after it becomes insolvent.

There is a silver lining in this. If Boris does call an early General Election, I believe that parliament will not only be hung (No singular party having a majority of seats) but I also believe they may not even be able to form a coalition. This in my opinion would be the best case scenario. This scenario will show the absolute illegitimacy of liberal democracy. It will single-handed end the bullshit era of 'Hope' and birth the true era of 'Despair'. That is fervent ground for a truly radical, revolutionary spirit.

TL;DR - Read it you lazy bint. You can't summarise this level of political intrigue.

yes

Agreed

I think Tik-Tok is a socialist

EU and NATO are past.The future is EAEU



This union would combine all states of the former Soviet Union, China, and the neighboring countries.

In meanwhile West build walls. East build bridges to connect all people.
New Silk Road will bring economic benefits for everyone.




i expect UK to join Eurasian Union in future
rest Europe countries will start to switch EU for EAEU membership



https://astanatimes.com/2019/10/eurasian-economic-union-serbia-sign-free-trade-agreement/

Serbs always join winning side xD
On other side are bulgarians they always join loser team.
In their short history they lost all balkan wars , ww1 and ww2 xD

Napsáno Skanderbeg, 30.10.2019 at 13:10

I think Tik-Tok is a socialist

You seem to forget that National Socialism is a Socialist philosophy. But I will admit, I was a little' 's' socialist before. I didn't like unions or worker collectives out of some strange brand loyalty. I've foregone these mental barriers and accepted that this is not the 1920's, and we have much to learn from the failures of the past. Unions and worker collectives are a necessary and much needed platform for greater social change, especially to alleviate issues affecting the working class. I'm also more aware of class consciousnesses, and how society has been shaped by class struggle, as well as global racial struggle.