Politics, Taxes and Laws

Napsáno Madrox1, 11.03.2013 at 12:55

Napsáno Tundy, 11.03.2013 at 12:44

Napsáno Madrox1, 11.03.2013 at 12:39

Napsáno Tundy, 11.03.2013 at 12:32

Napsáno Madrox1, 11.03.2013 at 11:40

Napsáno Guest, 11.03.2013 at 10:28

Napsáno Madrox1, 11.03.2013 at 06:51

Citovat:

Noobs not fighting for 20+ weeks. Scares me.

Weeks?
that´s a awful lot of time...
so you fear if people suddenly starts to play complete UN games, they will play for too much time on the same game because of the restrictions?
is that what you mean?

Weeks = turns, in Afterwind weeks were turns so yeah. I mean that people sit of their asses chatting and bidding in UN games rather then fight much. They complain when they get killed by somone taht was preparing and not saving money to bid for Cyprus.

Because the actual features that the game have do not permitt the UN to have REAL impact on the gameplay, they needed to be political moderators and in the end, can´´t do much when everyone gets crazy. i think politics whould have REAL importance in the gameplay, nto just a "wannabe" theater of geopolitcs. :/

the problem is that each time i play it, i get too much sp and then UN goes rougue to get my sp.
if they implement a sp penalty, un's will stop going rougue and this will increase gameplay.

I think to UN actually work on AtWar, it need to be re-designed, either UN or AtWar.

Re-design atwar to fitt un? Bullshit.
Un's should get a sp penalty so people stop farming sp.

You don´t get the point:
In fact, as much as i love Atwar for what it is , a overhauled Risk, i recognize that its gameplay is shallow, too simple and action-packed, i think it needs more depth and content, more game-modes, more features...unfortunately it seems that you guys are too fearful of change. :/

Napsáno Skittzophrenic, 11.03.2013 at 13:36

Napsáno Madrox1, 11.03.2013 at 12:55

Napsáno Tundy, 11.03.2013 at 12:44

Napsáno Madrox1, 11.03.2013 at 12:39

Napsáno Tundy, 11.03.2013 at 12:32

Napsáno Madrox1, 11.03.2013 at 11:40

Napsáno Guest, 11.03.2013 at 10:28

Napsáno Madrox1, 11.03.2013 at 06:51

Citovat:

Noobs not fighting for 20+ weeks. Scares me.

Weeks?
that´s a awful lot of time...
so you fear if people suddenly starts to play complete UN games, they will play for too much time on the same game because of the restrictions?
is that what you mean?

Weeks = turns, in Afterwind weeks were turns so yeah. I mean that people sit of their asses chatting and bidding in UN games rather then fight much. They complain when they get killed by somone taht was preparing and not saving money to bid for Cyprus.

Because the actual features that the game have do not permitt the UN to have REAL impact on the gameplay, they needed to be political moderators and in the end, can´´t do much when everyone gets crazy. i think politics whould have REAL importance in the gameplay, nto just a "wannabe" theater of geopolitcs. :/

the problem is that each time i play it, i get too much sp and then UN goes rougue to get my sp.
if they implement a sp penalty, un's will stop going rougue and this will increase gameplay.

I think to UN actually work on AtWar, it need to be re-designed, either UN or AtWar.

Re-design atwar to fitt un? Bullshit.
Un's should get a sp penalty so people stop farming sp.

You don´t get the point:
In fact, as much as i love Atwar for what it is , a overhauled Risk, i recognize that its gameplay is shallow, too simple and action-packed, i think it needs more depth and content, more game-modes, more features...unfortunately it seems that you guys are too fearful of change. :/

Then go play a game that involves that stuff. Troll.

Napsáno Madrox1, 11.03.2013 at 15:46

Napsáno Skittzophrenic, 11.03.2013 at 13:36

Napsáno Madrox1, 11.03.2013 at 12:55

Napsáno Tundy, 11.03.2013 at 12:44

Napsáno Madrox1, 11.03.2013 at 12:39

Napsáno Tundy, 11.03.2013 at 12:32

Napsáno Madrox1, 11.03.2013 at 11:40

Napsáno Guest, 11.03.2013 at 10:28

Napsáno Madrox1, 11.03.2013 at 06:51

Citovat:

Noobs not fighting for 20+ weeks. Scares me.

Weeks?
that´s a awful lot of time...
so you fear if people suddenly starts to play complete UN games, they will play for too much time on the same game because of the restrictions?
is that what you mean?

Weeks = turns, in Afterwind weeks were turns so yeah. I mean that people sit of their asses chatting and bidding in UN games rather then fight much. They complain when they get killed by somone taht was preparing and not saving money to bid for Cyprus.

Because the actual features that the game have do not permitt the UN to have REAL impact on the gameplay, they needed to be political moderators and in the end, can´´t do much when everyone gets crazy. i think politics whould have REAL importance in the gameplay, nto just a "wannabe" theater of geopolitcs. :/

the problem is that each time i play it, i get too much sp and then UN goes rougue to get my sp.
if they implement a sp penalty, un's will stop going rougue and this will increase gameplay.

I think to UN actually work on AtWar, it need to be re-designed, either UN or AtWar.

Re-design atwar to fitt un? Bullshit.
Un's should get a sp penalty so people stop farming sp.

You don´t get the point:
In fact, as much as i love Atwar for what it is , a overhauled Risk, i recognize that its gameplay is shallow, too simple and action-packed, i think it needs more depth and content, more game-modes, more features...unfortunately it seems that you guys are too fearful of change. :/

Then go play a game that involves that stuff. Troll.

Oh...there it is, fianly the mr."ad hominem" comes! how are you?
So, you saying that by defending that AtWar shoudn´t be restricted to "war" and represent reality a little bit, you saying that im the troll? curious, im yet to come into one of your topics and say "NO! ITS CANCER" and then when i ask you to clarify things you say "nanananana! cancer! cancer!", then, i will ask, who´s the troll?

Citovat:

>So then he said, "UN games would be better for AW!"

Napsáno Madrox1, 11.03.2013 at 18:59

Citovat:

>So then he said, "UN games would be better for AW!"

There´s no limit for you idiocy?

Napsáno Skittzophrenic, 11.03.2013 at 23:36

Napsáno Madrox1, 11.03.2013 at 18:59

Citovat:

>So then he said, "UN games would be better for AW!"

There´s no limit for you idiocy?

Nope.
But I don't know why you want this game to become a UN game. Makes no sense to me.

Napsáno NoOne, 11.03.2013 at 23:50

Madrox1 I suggest you try the Civilization series if you haven't already, it has many of the features you've been suggesting and there is some online multiplayer.

Citovat:

What about, gameplay variety? depth? new experiences?

Citovat:

Napsáno Skittzophrenic, 12.03.2013 at 01:13

What about, gameplay variety? depth? new experiences?

No, no one wants to play UN games. End of story.

Citovat:

Citovat:

eer skittz? Noobs/Un Zombies still play UN games :/. We haven't cured them yet.

Napsáno Madrox1, 12.03.2013 at 01:13

Napsáno NoOne, 11.03.2013 at 23:50

Madrox1 I suggest you try the Civilization series if you haven't already, it has many of the features you've been suggesting and there is some online multiplayer.

You bet i know Civilization ( i said that on my topic on Off-Topic forum), btu still, AtWar is a different game, i justahd this felling that would be awesome to have some features like that. :/

Napsáno NoOne, 12.03.2013 at 14:06

Napsáno Madrox1, 12.03.2013 at 01:13

Napsáno NoOne, 11.03.2013 at 23:50

Madrox1 I suggest you try the Civilization series if you haven't already, it has many of the features you've been suggesting and there is some online multiplayer.

You bet i know Civilization ( i said that on my topic on Off-Topic forum), btu still, AtWar is a different game, i justahd this felling that would be awesome to have some features like that. :/

Well Madrox1 you answered it yourself. AtWar is a different game, and not Civilization.

Napsáno Madrox1, 12.03.2013 at 15:14

Napsáno NoOne, 12.03.2013 at 14:06

Napsáno Madrox1, 12.03.2013 at 01:13

Napsáno NoOne, 11.03.2013 at 23:50

Madrox1 I suggest you try the Civilization series if you haven't already, it has many of the features you've been suggesting and there is some online multiplayer.

You bet i know Civilization ( i said that on my topic on Off-Topic forum), btu still, AtWar is a different game, i justahd this felling that would be awesome to have some features like that. :/

Well Madrox1 you answered it yourself. AtWar is a different game, and not Civilization.

I maintain my position, i still think it would be best to have more gameplay diversity. Something like "mods", why not?

Citovat:

Boy you won't give up. No one wants it, now quit it.

Napsáno Skittzophrenic, 12.03.2013 at 21:08

Napsáno Madrox1, 12.03.2013 at 15:14

Napsáno NoOne, 12.03.2013 at 14:06

Napsáno Madrox1, 12.03.2013 at 01:13

Napsáno NoOne, 11.03.2013 at 23:50

Madrox1 I suggest you try the Civilization series if you haven't already, it has many of the features you've been suggesting and there is some online multiplayer.

You bet i know Civilization ( i said that on my topic on Off-Topic forum), btu still, AtWar is a different game, i justahd this felling that would be awesome to have some features like that. :/

Well Madrox1 you answered it yourself. AtWar is a different game, and not Civilization.

I maintain my position, i still think it would be best to have more gameplay diversity. Something like "mods", why not?

Boy you won't give up. No one wants it, now quit it.

Napsáno NoOne, 12.03.2013 at 23:05

The thing is you are suggesting too much to change and implement.
You suggested 5 different things that aren't too bad, but you have to work on them one at a time not all at once.
If something like this ever does become an option in atWar it will be after a long period of small changes.

Napsáno Skittzophrenic, 13.03.2013 at 00:43

Here's an option, ask Amok and Ivan directly and see what they say.

Napsáno Madrox1, 13.03.2013 at 01:00

Napsáno Skittzophrenic, 13.03.2013 at 00:43

Here's an option, ask Amok and Ivan directly and see what they say.

That´s actually a good idea.
but still, i posted this topic specifically for the community and the devs to see and comment on it, if they have something to say to this, why would i have a debate with them in private? don´t you think its counter-productive to the exchange of ideas?

Napsáno Tundy, 13.03.2013 at 10:58

Napsáno Madrox1, 13.03.2013 at 01:00

Napsáno Skittzophrenic, 13.03.2013 at 00:43

Here's an option, ask Amok and Ivan directly and see what they say.

That´s actually a good idea.
but still, i posted this topic specifically for the community and the devs to see and comment on it, if they have something to say to this, why would i have a debate with them in private? don´t you think its counter-productive to the exchange of ideas?

hahahahahaha
do you really think admins will ever read it?
lol

Napsáno Cpt.Magic, 15.03.2013 at 22:01

As creator of the un game i dont think afterwind or atwar is ready for this but it would be cool for this to be put in

Un dont cause cancer the idiots that dont play it right do :-P

Napsáno Cpt.Magic, 15.03.2013 at 22:01

As creator of the un game i dont think afterwind or atwar is ready for this but it would be cool for this to be put in

Un dont cause cancer the idiots that dont play it right do :-P

Napsáno Tundy, 16.03.2013 at 13:47

Napsáno Cpt.Magic, 15.03.2013 at 22:01

As creator of the un game i dont think afterwind or atwar is ready for this but it would be cool for this to be put in

Un dont cause cancer the idiots that dont play it right do :-P

excuse me? last time i played as Southern Europe.
Raped Canada with marines.

you choosed usa and where acting like a little bitch, and wanted to fight me 3 vs 1.


Then, i played as eastern europe. and raped you as russia, and raped italy. then i was declared rougue lol.

Napsáno Guest, 16.03.2013 at 02:13

Napsáno Cpt.Magic, 15.03.2013 at 22:01

As creator of the un game i dont think afterwind or atwar is ready for this but it would be cool for this to be put in

Un dont cause cancer the idiots that dont play it right do :-P

And the noobs who sit on their asses for 20 turns and not fighting.